2017
DOI: 10.5455/ijmsph.2017.1164412122016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of drug-related problems and clinical pharmacist interventions on therapeutic outcomes of the patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, as with other studies, 41‐43 the clinical pharmacist intervened on the majority of DRPs. The average intervention per DRPs was 1.04, which was lower than a previous report (1.46 interventions per DRPs) 35 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In the current study, as with other studies, 41‐43 the clinical pharmacist intervened on the majority of DRPs. The average intervention per DRPs was 1.04, which was lower than a previous report (1.46 interventions per DRPs) 35 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Our study showed more DRP's in people who stayed for 3-7 days. 9,12,17 This might be due to shifting of patients to better hospital setting (rural to urban setting) due to complex comorbidities. The other fact may be that the more patients have been discharged shareef et al, 10 and Rashmi Adhikari et al, 11 Drug interactions (40.6%) were highest followed by ADR's (18.73%), Drug Choice Problems (17.14%), Dosing Problems (9.84%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies in different settings were in accordance with these results. 9,12,17 Antimicrobials were the class of drugs which mostly contributed to the Drug Related Problems (27.54%). 11,12 This result might be due to inclusion of antibiotic in maximum number of medication chart and irrationality while prescribing them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of 231 (60.15%) patients who experienced MRPs, 62% of MRPs were found in males, which is similar with the result of two studies done in India. 28 , 29 This might be due to increased medication use because of comorbid condition was higher in males and other various risk factors like smoking, alcoholism and chewing Khat compared to females. The prevalence of MRP was found to be 60.15% and average of MRPs per patient was 1.25± 1.18, which was lower than study conducted at JUMC (83.5%) and 2.6 ± 1.8, the difference could be due to setting difference where our study conducted chronic follow up patients in which senior physicians and clinical pharmacists are available more frequently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%