2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2021.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of e-scooter sharing on bike sharing in Chicago

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To prove the link of these two modes of transport, a study carried out in Chicago analysed the data of two sharing companies. The results proved that users of bike sharing decreased by 10.2% in the area reserved for shared vehicles with the introduction of shared e-scooters [ 9 ]. However, the real difference between these two transport modes lies in safety.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prove the link of these two modes of transport, a study carried out in Chicago analysed the data of two sharing companies. The results proved that users of bike sharing decreased by 10.2% in the area reserved for shared vehicles with the introduction of shared e-scooters [ 9 ]. However, the real difference between these two transport modes lies in safety.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, average dockless e-scooter trips were longer in terms of travel distance by a third and approximately twice as long in terms of travel time than the average docked shared bike trips [20]. Another study in Chicago found that the average travel time of scooter trips is shorter than bike trips [22]. Surprisingly, earlier work found that dockless shared e-scooters are less sensitive to weather conditions than docked shared bikes [23].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Within the second stream of research, a number of studies compared docked bikes and dockless e-bikes or e-scooters in several US cities including Washington, D.C., San Francisco, Louisville, Chicago, and Austin [7,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. In terms of the interaction between e-scooter and transit modes, previously published papers suggest that public transit and scooter complemented each other [25][26][27].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on the network evolution of e-scooter sharing is still limited, although a particular interest is to compare e-scooter/e-bike sharing with conventional bike-sharing. The former’s advantages lie in better performance regarding sharing frequency, fleet size [ 64 ], and better replacement potential of first and last-mile or short trips [ 8 , 60 ], compared with bike-sharing.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%