2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00392-022-02022-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of early ablation of atrial fibrillation on long-term outcomes: results from phase II/III of the GLORIA-AF registry

Abstract: Background First-line ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) reduces the risk of recurrent atrial arrhythmias compared to medical therapy. However, the prognostic benefit of early AF ablation remains undetermined. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the effects of early AF ablation compared to medical therapy. Methods Using data from phase II/III of the GLORIA-AF registry, we studied patients who were consecutively enrolled with newly diagnosed AF (< 3 months b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The GLORIA-AF is a global, multicenter prospective registry structured in three phases, which aims to evaluate the longterm safety and effectiveness of dabigatran in real-world patients with AF. Complete details on the design of the GLORIA-AF study have been previously reported, 20,21 as well as the primary papers comparing dabigatran versus VKA and other NOACs. 22,23 Briefly, patients with new-onset nonvalvular AF and CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score !1 were consecutively enrolled between 2011 and 2016 (2011-2014 for phase II, and 2014-2016 for phase III).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GLORIA-AF is a global, multicenter prospective registry structured in three phases, which aims to evaluate the longterm safety and effectiveness of dabigatran in real-world patients with AF. Complete details on the design of the GLORIA-AF study have been previously reported, 20,21 as well as the primary papers comparing dabigatran versus VKA and other NOACs. 22,23 Briefly, patients with new-onset nonvalvular AF and CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score !1 were consecutively enrolled between 2011 and 2016 (2011-2014 for phase II, and 2014-2016 for phase III).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 10 studies compared the stroke between patients who received catheter ablation and patients who did not receive ablation [12,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. By random-effect model meta-analysis, catheter-based AF ablation reduced the risk of stroke by 39% (HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.49-0.77) compared with patients treated with medical therapy as shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Comparison Of Outcomes Between Ablation and Non-ablation Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sources: References [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] A total of eight studies assessed the all-cause mortality between the study groups [12][13][14][15]17,[19][20][21]. The risk of all-cause mortality was significantly lower in patients receiving catheter-based AF ablation compared to patients treated with medical therapy (HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.51-0.71) as shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Figure 2: Forest Plots Comparing Ablation Vs No Ablation Gro...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations