2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of eco-embeddedness and strategic flexibility on innovation performance of non-core firms: The perspective of ecological legitimacy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
20
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…SF mediates the association between entrepreneurial leadership and innovation performance; additionally, SF increases performance in radical innovation both in a certain situation and an environment with technological turbulence [ 40 , 41 ]. To expand firms’ resource pools and establish co-collaboration in innovation activities, SF partially mediates the relationship among the eco-embeddedness position, eco-embeddedness relation, and innovation performance of non-core firms [ 42 ]. In the organizations’ mechanism of acquiring external knowledge, SF also plays a mediator role [ 43 ].…”
Section: Literature Review and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SF mediates the association between entrepreneurial leadership and innovation performance; additionally, SF increases performance in radical innovation both in a certain situation and an environment with technological turbulence [ 40 , 41 ]. To expand firms’ resource pools and establish co-collaboration in innovation activities, SF partially mediates the relationship among the eco-embeddedness position, eco-embeddedness relation, and innovation performance of non-core firms [ 42 ]. In the organizations’ mechanism of acquiring external knowledge, SF also plays a mediator role [ 43 ].…”
Section: Literature Review and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The innovation ecosystem is a dynamically coordinated system composed of many different actors, such as the government, enterprises, universities, research institutions, and financial institutions [6][7][8]. Specifically, by aggregating the advantageous resources of all innovation actors embedded in the system, the innovation ecosystem can provide solid resources and a sufficient innovation impetus for green innovation projects involving government-industry-university-research cooperation [9]. For instance, Haier Group built HOPE, an open innovation ecosystem, to cooperate with its upstream suppliers, research institutions, and universities for the purpose of jointly developing new technologies and products [3,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, how the resources in innovation ecosystems can be transformed into green innovation ability is crucial for SMMEs [9,14]. Green value co-creation practices (GVCCPs) are common processes in which actors achieve common goals [16], so they are important in the process of resource transformation in SMMEs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of strategic flexibility is well studied in strategic management literature owing to its ability to help firms improve firm performance (Combe et al , 2012; Nadkarni and Narayanan, 2007; Saini and Johnson, 2005; Verdú-Jover et al , 2014; Kafetzopoulos et al , 2022). Researchers have discussed the impact of strategic flexibility on firm performance in various contexts like industry clockspeed (Nadkarni and Narayanan, 2007), CEO personality (Nadkarni and Herrmann, 2010), innovative human resource practices (Xiu et al , 2017), strategic orientations, (Han and Zhang, 2021) and innovation performance (Zang et al , 2022) among others. However, there is a dearth of studies that have studied flexibility through business model innovation (BMI).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%