Impact of Education-based HEART Score Pathway on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Utilization and Yield in the Emergency Department

Abstract

Objective: There is a growing consensus to reduce unnecessary testing among low-risk chest pain patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of implementing an education-based HEART score pathway in the emergency department on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) utilization and yield. Methods: A retrospective before and after intervention study was conducted at a single site. Adult emergency department patients undergoing CCTA for suspected acute coronary syndrome were included. Primary outcomes were CCTA utilization and yield. Utilization was defined as the percentage of patients evaluated with CCTA and yield was calculated as the percentage of patients with a diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease, defined as ≥50% stenosis in any one coronary artery due to atherosclerosis. Results: 1540 patients undergoing CCTAs were included. CCTA utilization before and after were 2.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.0–2.3] and 2.0% (95% CI 1.9–2.2), respectively; mean difference 0.1% (95% CI −0.1 to 0.3; P = 0.21). The mean age was 53 years (SD = 11) and females were 52%. Of 1477 patients included in CCTA yield analysis, patients diagnosed with obstructive coronary artery disease before and after were 15.0% (95% CI 12.6–17.7) and 16.2% (95% CI 13.6–19.1), respectively; mean difference 1.2% (95% CI −2.6 to 5.1; P = 0.53). Conclusions: There was no significant change in the CCTA utilization or yield after the implementation of an education-based HEART pathway in a large academic center. Our findings suggest adopting a more comprehensive approach for deploying such evidence-based protocols to increase institutional compliance.

Impact of HEART Score Decision Aid on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Utilization and Diagnostic Yield in the Emergency Department

“…These time periods allowed a matching comparison to the data obtained from the prior education-based HEART pathway implemented at our institution. 15 While we did not expect that time period would impact yield outcome, utilization outcome could vary by month. Hence, we chose the same 6 months for before and after periods in this study to ensure consistency.…”

“…Our previously conducted study showed that this approach failed to reduce CCTA utilization and did not improve the yield of obstructive CAD. 15 We believed this lack of effect was due to low use of HSs and the suggested algorithm.…”