Rapid
small-scale column tests (RSSCTs) are often used
to assess
the efficacy of adsorption media, such as granular activated carbon
(GAC) and anion exchange resin (AER) in removing perfluoroalkyl acids
(PFAAs) from impacted waters. By reducing GAC and AER particle sizes
via grinding, RSSCTs allow for enhanced mass transfer and simulation
of long-term field or pilot testing in a much shorter time frame under
controlled laboratory settings. Fluoro-Sorb (FS), a novel surface-modified
organoclay sorbent, has recently been used for removal of PFAAs in
drinking water applications and is receiving increased attention as
an alternative to GAC or AER. However, unlike GAC and AER products,
the appropriateness of employing RSSCTs for assessing PFAA removal
from impacted water using ground versus unground (i.e., as-received)
FS has not been assessed. Herein, bench-scale column experiments were
conducted using FS to preliminarily determine the scaling relationship
needed to properly design RSSCTs and to compare the PFAA removal effectiveness
to GACs and AERs. With respect to scaling, results indicated that
an RSSCT approach assuming constant diffusivity was appropriate for
FS. In general, FS outperformed GAC and AER with respect to treatment
of long-chained PFAAs. No desorption of organic carbon or quaternary
amines or leaching of metals was observed from the FS. However, a
slight change in chloride to sulfate mass ratio (CSMR) and high pH
excursions were observed, highlighting the need for proper monitoring
immediately following FS startup to avoid unwanted changes in water
quality.