Impact of Electronic Monitoring on Employees: A Meta-Analysis

Siegel, Rudolf; König, Cornelius J.; Lazăr,

doi:10.31234/osf.io/fk5ez

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 57 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Given the poor record of performance management programs generally (Pulakos et al, 2019), and electronic performance monitoring specifically (Siegel et al, 2021), the failure of BWCs to achieve consistent results should not surprise (assuming one accepts BWCs are a form of electronic performance monitoring, a task I take up in Chapter 2). The authors of a recent review of electronic monitoring offer up several suggestions, one of which is to use electronic monitoring in the workplace to develop, rather than deter employees (Tomczak et al, 2018).…”

Section: Body-worn Cameras In the United Statesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, the majority of research in this area tends to highlight the unintended, most often negative, impacts from increased workplace surveillance. While electronic performance monitoring is often sold as a performance-enhancing tool, the link between the two is weak to non-existent, while the costs to the employees are better established (Siegel et al, 2021). Workplace surveillance has been linked to increases in stress and poor health outcomes in surveilled employees (Aiello & Shao, 1993; M. J.…”

Section: Electronic Performance Monitoring In the Workplacementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Modeling Officer Perceptions of Body-worn Cameras: A National Survey

Adams¹

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Body-worn cameras (BWCs) are a permanent, though not well understood, feature of modern US policing. As a technological solution to the perception that officers use force too often, BWCs have not fared well. This dissertation sidesteps questions of effectiveness, however, and instead investigates how the cameras are perceived by officers, and how variations in BWC policies affect perceptions of monitoring fairness. To do so, I use a national probability sample of officers (n = 529) drawn from a stratified sample of agencies across the United States.Theoretically, I draw primarily from two literatures. First, from the organizational psychology literature, which is where the vast majority of research on the individual-level effects of electronic workplace surveillance has been done. Second, I draw on the organizationaljustice literature, specifically elements related to how criminal justice employees form judgements of fairness regarding their workplace treatment. The results show how policy variation in BWC activation and footage review affect officer perceptions of fairnessboth on their own and interactively.

show abstract

Section: Body-worn Cameras In the United Statesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Electronic Performance Monitoring In the Workplacementioning

confidence: 99%