2014
DOI: 10.21909/sp.2014.02.653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Emotional Valence and Different Source Problem Conditions on the Resolution of Analogical Target Problems

Abstract: An experimental study was conducted to clarify the impact of the source problem (present/absent) and of the emotional valence (positive/negative) on the way analogical target problems are solved. Analogical problems were represented by two types of PC games. Film clips were used to elicit emotions, whereas emotional changes were monitored by SAM scale. It was found that the presence of source problem increased the speed of solving a target problem and led to analogical problem solving even though a non-analogi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning negative emotions, it is considered that they lead to more systematic information processing. For example, negative emotions stimulate well-known and verified reactions, while positive valence stimulates experimental and creative tendencies while solving a cognitive task (Jurásová, Biela, & Spajdel, 2014). There is also empirical evidence of the associations of valence of affective states with judgements of future events (see Angie, Connelly, Waples, & Kligyte, 2011 for review).…”
Section: Affective Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning negative emotions, it is considered that they lead to more systematic information processing. For example, negative emotions stimulate well-known and verified reactions, while positive valence stimulates experimental and creative tendencies while solving a cognitive task (Jurásová, Biela, & Spajdel, 2014). There is also empirical evidence of the associations of valence of affective states with judgements of future events (see Angie, Connelly, Waples, & Kligyte, 2011 for review).…”
Section: Affective Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%