2020
DOI: 10.17515/resm2019.156ic2809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Energy Efficient Design Parameters on Energy Consumption in Hot-Humid Climate Zones

Abstract: DisclaimerAll the opinions and statements expressed in the papers are on the responsibility of author(s) and are not to be regarded as those of the journal of Research on Engineering Structures and Materials (RESM) organization or related parties. The publishers make no warranty, explicit or implied, or make any representation with respect to the contents of any article will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, equations, or other information should be independently verified… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assessing the performance of the most common simulating and modeling applications for green building energy consumption [18].…”
Section: Aim Methods Findings and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assessing the performance of the most common simulating and modeling applications for green building energy consumption [18].…”
Section: Aim Methods Findings and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suitable energy analysis software can not only provide accurate analysis results, but it can also improve the efficiency of the analysis. In order to find suitable software for the energy performance of a building, Al Ka'bi [18] evaluated the performance of the most common simulating and modeling applications for green building energy consumption. They compared and ranked the building energy analysis performance of 10 of the most common energy in the unifying criteria, and the final ranked result in descending order was as follows: (1) TRNSYS, (2) Ecotect, (3) Autodesk-GBS, (4) EnergyPlus, (5) IES-VE, (6) IDAICE, (7) VIP-Energy, (8) DesignBuilder, (9) eQUEST, and (10) RIUSKA.…”
Section: Aim Methods Findings and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%