2004
DOI: 10.1108/14777830410560700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of environmental management system implementation on financial performance

Abstract: Environmental management systems (EMS) seek to make companies simultaneously more competitive and environmentally responsible. Improved environmental performance can be sought from the adaptation of techniques that emphasize reduction of waste and process/product redesign in the quest of reducing environmental impact. However, EMS lacks a framework to quantify improvements and much of the evidence of EMS's impact on financial performance is anecdotal. This lack of theoretical development has served to diminish… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
66
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
4
66
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the theoretical views and empirical research are not conclusive about the competitive consequences of environmental proactivity. While some scholars found a positive relationship (e.g., [43,44]), others did not recognize a positive impact of proactive environmental strategy on firm's financial performance (e.g., [45,46]). Klassen and Whybark proved that preventive technologies instead of control technologies significantly affect operational (manufacturing) performance [47].…”
Section: Proactive Environmental Strategy and Firm Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the theoretical views and empirical research are not conclusive about the competitive consequences of environmental proactivity. While some scholars found a positive relationship (e.g., [43,44]), others did not recognize a positive impact of proactive environmental strategy on firm's financial performance (e.g., [45,46]). Klassen and Whybark proved that preventive technologies instead of control technologies significantly affect operational (manufacturing) performance [47].…”
Section: Proactive Environmental Strategy and Firm Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because, while some studies have documented a positive relationship (e.g. Aragó n-Correa and Rubio-Ló pez, 2007;Galdeano-Gó mez et al, 2008;Nakao et al, 2007;Wahba, 2008), others do not identify a positive impact of environmental proactivity on financial performance (Link and Naveh, 2006;Wagner, 2005;Watson et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Some studies have shown a positive relationship between environmental performance and firm performance, for example, Aragón-Correa, Hurtado-Torres, & García-Morales (2008), Klassen and McLaughlin (1996), Nakao, Amano, Matsumura, Genba, & Nakano (2007), and Russo and Fouts (1997). Other studies such as Cordeiro and Sarkis (1997), Wagner (2005), Walley and Whitehead (1994), and Watson, Klingenberg, Polito, & Geurts (2004) argue that there is a conflict between competitiveness of firms and their environmental performance and show a negative relationship. The existing literature therefore provides a mixed message to business managers, policy makers and other stakeholders who are interested in protecting the environment through promoting corporate responsible behaviors (Zeng, Meng, Yin, Tam, & Sun, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%