“…In spite of optimizing the protocol over time, current studies report that the P/AI at the first TAI rarely exceed 65.0% and show F I G U R E 1 Diagram of the administered protocols in GRN and GRU groups focused on the synchronization (SO) and resynchronization (RES) of ovulation in Bos taurus indicus cows. EB on d0: estradiol benzoate, 2 mg IM; EB on d32: 1 mg (Bioestrogen, Biogenesis Bagó, Curitiba, Brazil); PGF: D-Cloprostenol, 500 μg IM (Croniben, Biogenesis Bagó); eCG: equine chorionic gonadotropin, 300 IU IM (Ecegon, Biogenesis Bagó); EC: estradiol cypionate, 0.5 mg IM (Croni-cip, Biogenesis Bagó); GRN: intravaginal progesterone device (new) 1 g (Cronipres, Biogenesis Bagó); GRU: intravaginal progesterone device (used) 1 g (Cronipres Mono dose, Biogenesis Bagó); US: ultrasonography; PD: pregnancy diagnosis significant variation (51.4%, 48.8%, and 62.7%; Oliveira et al, 2016;Sá Filho, Crespilho, Santos, Perry, & Baruselli, 2010;Sá Filho, Dias, Lamb, & Vasconcelos, 2010;Souza et al, 2016), respectively. More recently, researchers improved the traditional method of oestrous synchronization and ovulation and subsequent TAI to increase the pregnancy rate by performing resynchronization followed by TAI in animals that did not become pregnant after the first artificial insemination, with the aim of optimizing P/AI in the breeding season (Marques et al, 2015).…”