@ERSpublicationsThe window of possible catch-up alveolarisation seems quite large: good news for the young and the old http://ow.ly/WNPIVThe way the human lung grows post-natally has intrigued many of us and many of our predecessors, and still does. Originally exclusively based on post mortem findings, it was concluded that a large variability in number of alveoli exists between humans and that this wide scatter is present not only at birth but also in childhood [1,2]. From these cross-sectional anatomical studies, it could not be inferred whether catch-up (increase of alveolar numbers) is possible, whether interindividual differences in longitudinal growth patterns exist and when physiological alveolar multiplication ends. Classically, many authors assumed that new alveoli are formed up to at least 8 years of age [3,4] but from the largest morphometric study, it was concluded that the number of alveoli in both sexes increased little or not at all after the age of 2 years [2]. The hypothesis was that thereafter, further lung growth consists of dimensional growth of alveoli only. Similar growth patterns were assumed to exist in post-pneumectomy compensatory lung growth, with very little indication that multiplication occurs in adolescence or thereafter [5]. Obviously, to study the alveolar increase during growth, other techniques should be used.Methods suitable to study longitudinal growth of airways and airspaces are the techniques that assess respiratory function in health [6][7][8] and disease [9,10] or the techniques revealing lung structure [11,12]. Although several studies have actually attempted to assess growth of lungs and airways during childhood and/or adolescence, it is difficult to draw solid conclusions because of significant limitations in the techniques themselves or in the interpretations of results.Furthermore, the assessment of growth of the lung parenchyma and of alveolarisation is complicated by physiological changes: during childhood, the compliance of the chest wall decreases while that of the lung parenchyma increases. This results in a relative under-inflation during early childhood, and a relative overinflation in adolescence and adulthood [13,14]. This also explains the relative decrease in closing volume with age [13] and can be seen as an improvement of mixing efficiency of the lung during growth. So, it is a natural phenomenon that the lung is relatively under-distended in infants and preschool children, and relatively over-distended from childhood to adulthood: hence, one could conclude that the physiological aeriation of the lungs and, consequently, also alveolar size, is age dependent. Clearly, this has consequences for structural and functional assessments of the lungs.Besides that, interpreting respiratory function studies is complex and not straightforward, because not all variables are controlled for or known, and because the sensitivity of the techniques may be low. Most respiratory function studies reflect (mainly central) airway function, and not actual function of the peri...