2015
DOI: 10.3390/f6082879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of European Union Timber Regulation on Forest Certification Strategies in the Finnish Wood Industry Value Chain

Abstract: Abstract:The aim of this explorative study is to find out how the EU Timber Regulation (EUTR) has affected the forest and chain of custody (CoC) certification strategies and practices among the Finnish wood industry companies. We are especially interested to find out whether more integrated strategies and collaborative networks have emerged for enhanced communications throughout the industry value chains. This qualitative interview study included both EUTR ex ante and ex post analysis, based on three rounds of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, certified companies participating in this study did not perceive the EUTR as negatively affecting their suppliers, exports or customers. These findings are consistent with previous observations that only minor changes and costs are likely to occur for firms with existing forest and CoC certificates [19]. However, there are concerns that new requirements introduced through the EUTR would raise additional costs for companies and in turn hinder their competitiveness on the EU timber market.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Hence, certified companies participating in this study did not perceive the EUTR as negatively affecting their suppliers, exports or customers. These findings are consistent with previous observations that only minor changes and costs are likely to occur for firms with existing forest and CoC certificates [19]. However, there are concerns that new requirements introduced through the EUTR would raise additional costs for companies and in turn hinder their competitiveness on the EU timber market.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The certification statements included the main objectives and purposes of having CoC certification, including promotion and management of sustainable forest resources [3][4][5], traceability and confidence in sourcing certified raw materials and products [31], legality issues [32,36,38], market access [14,17,18], potential for improved communication [49], and possible improvements in internal efficiency of material flows, and effects on corporate management [18,30].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only minor additional operator costs are required to make these systems fully compatible with EUTR requirements [37]. The impact will mainly be on small and medium enterprises importing timber from outside the EU without existing traceability systems [38]. EUTR as a public policy may potentially have a positive effect on the acceptance of certification [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most importantly, our study sheds light on how origin and certification can contribute to the forest sector's competitiveness against other material sectors, an area that lacks research. This is also an area concerning the forest industry and which has affected their attitudes in terms of forest certification's capability to improve competitive advantage and gain price premiums [15,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%