2019
DOI: 10.1161/jaha.118.010616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Family Socioeconomic Status on Health‐Related Quality of Life in Children With Critical Congenital Heart Disease

Abstract: Background Socioeconomic status ( SES ) is associated with health‐related quality of life ( HRQOL ) for children with critical congenital heart disease; however, literature from newly industrialized countries is scarce. Methods and Results This cross‐sectional study included 2037 surviving patients operated on for critical congenital heart disease at a tertiary hospital in China between May 2012 and December 2015. Al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These families may likewise have more resources to identify the first psychotic symptoms and enable an earlier engagement with mental health services [ 73 ]. It could also translate more family support or means to provide better care in the post-FEP period [ 74 ]. In any case, our results emphasize the need for social interventions to promote and educate on mental health and facilitate the access to mental health services in the pre- and post-FEP period [ 75 , 76 ], as it has been done in Australia through the headspace initiative ( ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These families may likewise have more resources to identify the first psychotic symptoms and enable an earlier engagement with mental health services [ 73 ]. It could also translate more family support or means to provide better care in the post-FEP period [ 74 ]. In any case, our results emphasize the need for social interventions to promote and educate on mental health and facilitate the access to mental health services in the pre- and post-FEP period [ 75 , 76 ], as it has been done in Australia through the headspace initiative ( ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aiming at assessing this factor, Jackson et al surveyed individual income of CHD patients and showed that earning less than US$30,000 per year explained 23% of the variability in the QoL [12]. A recent study in Chinese children suffering from CHD showed that there is an association between QoL and socioeconomic status [40], assessed by means of household income, parental occupation and educational level. Nevertheless, the mechanism by which socioeconomic level influences QoL is still not fully characterized.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that CHD causes poverty or that inability to pay makes access to healthcare more problematic [12], which is not the case for Chilean patients. Other plausible explanations are an eventual link between poverty and low health literacy, affecting patients' adherence and healthcare consulting behavior [40], and the effect of long-term and comprehensive rehabilitation therapy, which is often expensive. The association between socioeconomic status and these patients' QoL should be carefully explored, as well as the underlying mechanisms.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This said, our mean emotional functioning scores were similar to those of patients with corrected defects in Pakistan, 18 higher than those of palliated single ventricle patients in two high-income countries, 15,16 and lower than those of healthy control groups in both low-middle 4 and high-income countries. 12,14,16,17 Established predictors of poorer emotional quality-of-life in patients with corrected or palliated defects or those with mild lesions that did not require corrective surgery include: low family income, 12,17,[19][20][21][22] short duration of parental education, 23 single parent status, 24 ethnic minority status, 25 absence of spirituality, 25 at least one regular symptom, 19,26 subjective exercise limitation, 27 NYHA class, 23 ROSS Class, 28 objective exercise capacity, 19,29 specific lesion types, 13,18,[30][31][32] lesion complexity, 12,13,16,[33][34][35][36][37] previous surgeries, 38 number of clinic appointments, 27,33 school absence, 23,39 and medication burden. 18,27,33,39...…”
Section: Comparison To Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%