2005
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2005.03.099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Five Prophylactic Filgrastim Schedules on Hematologic Toxicity in Early Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide

Abstract: In the adjuvant setting, the frequency of prophylactic G-CSF administration during EC could be curtailed to only two administrations (days 8 and 12) without altering outcome. This nonrandomized trial design provides support for evaluating alternative, less intense G-CSF schedules for women with early breast cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, use of CTX is often restricted due to cytotoxic effects that result from formation of reactive metabolites that alkylate DNA and proteins, and also produce cross-links. Among the adverse side-effects that often subsequently result are nausea, mucosal ulceration, vomiting, pulmonary fibrosis, skin pigmentation, hematopoietic suppression, nephrotoxicity, urotoxicity, and hepatotoxicity (Amudha et al, 2007;Kiuchi et al, 2009;Papaldo et al, 2005). To combat this, CTX is currently used in combination with other protective agents with the purpose of reducing the adverse toxic effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, use of CTX is often restricted due to cytotoxic effects that result from formation of reactive metabolites that alkylate DNA and proteins, and also produce cross-links. Among the adverse side-effects that often subsequently result are nausea, mucosal ulceration, vomiting, pulmonary fibrosis, skin pigmentation, hematopoietic suppression, nephrotoxicity, urotoxicity, and hepatotoxicity (Amudha et al, 2007;Kiuchi et al, 2009;Papaldo et al, 2005). To combat this, CTX is currently used in combination with other protective agents with the purpose of reducing the adverse toxic effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these recommendations, the literature data confirm that the scheduling of rHu-G-CSF is extremely variable among different authors ranging from 2 days (19) to 14 days (20) or until recovery of 10,000 neutrophils/lL (21,22). In the Papaldo et al (13) study, one group of patients was treated prophylactically with 300 lg on the 8th and 12th day after chemotherapy. No differences were observed in the rate of FN in this group, compared with the more intensive treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…administration of G-CSF at the 8th and 12th day after chemotherapy, may equally prevent neutropenia and chemotherapy delay (13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 Less frequent dosing of daily G-CSF through a cycle has been studied in the setting of patients receiving relatively lower myelosuppressive chemotherapy, consisting of an anthracycline and cytoxan for breast cancer. 34 Intermittent schedules were not significantly worse in daily dosing.…”
Section: Prophylaxis Of Chemotherapy-induced Neutropoeniamentioning
confidence: 96%