2011
DOI: 10.1097/gco.0b013e3283455288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of follicle stimulating hormone receptor variants in fertility

Abstract: The identification of FSHR variants in a select infertility patient population has significant clinical implications in demonstrating a possible genetic cause to female infertility and improves our understanding of the genetic basis of infertility as a whole. Pharmacogenomics is a new field aiming to devise individualized treatments for disorders based on the genetic signature of the patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
(72 reference statements)
2
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is, however, a plethora of studies analyzing retrospectively the relevance of FSHR and other gene polymorphisms for ovarian response (variably defined) in ART programs based on different types of patients. To mention only the most recent ones, some studies confirm the impact of the FSHR c.2039AOG SNP (40), some do not (49) and this reflects faithfully the results of over a decade of literature summarized in recent reviews (12,13,14,15,16,17,50). The heterogeneity of the study designs, patient characteristics, and primary end points, often in the absence of power analysis, together with relatively advanced age of women in ART programs are the possible reasons for this inconsistency (Supplementary Table 1).…”
Section: Pharmacogenetic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is, however, a plethora of studies analyzing retrospectively the relevance of FSHR and other gene polymorphisms for ovarian response (variably defined) in ART programs based on different types of patients. To mention only the most recent ones, some studies confirm the impact of the FSHR c.2039AOG SNP (40), some do not (49) and this reflects faithfully the results of over a decade of literature summarized in recent reviews (12,13,14,15,16,17,50). The heterogeneity of the study designs, patient characteristics, and primary end points, often in the absence of power analysis, together with relatively advanced age of women in ART programs are the possible reasons for this inconsistency (Supplementary Table 1).…”
Section: Pharmacogenetic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, controversies exist concerning the impact of genetic polymorphisms of these genes on gonadotropin treatment and some contradictory findings have been published. Several good reviews appeared recently in the literature summarizing the current knowledge, covering various aspects of this topic (12,13,14,15,16,17), and showing clearly that, currently, there is not enough evidence to provide practical clinical recommendations for the pharmacogenetic use of FSH.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences may be explained by the distribution of 307 and 680 FSHR SNPs, which have a great variability, when they are compared in different populations and even in populations that are considered to be similar of the genetic background, they show different frequencies [39]. About the Asn680Ser, Jun et al [23] it was realized that women who are Ser680Ser, showed lower estradiol levels and fewer captured oocytes than other genotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of these genes, follicle stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR), showed association with preterm birth in case/control cohorts of mothers of Finnish and African-American ancestry. Variants in FSHR have been linked to female infertility (Lalioti 2011), a known risk factor for preterm birth. Suggested function in the uterus and cervix and an influence on PR isoform abundance in mice (Danilovich et al 2002), provide further www.perspectivesinmedicine.org possibilities for its potential involvement in normal birth timing and preterm birth risk.…”
Section: Selective Pressures and Adaptive Evolution In Human Pregnancmentioning
confidence: 99%