Impact of formal climate risk transfer mechanisms on risk-aversion: Empirical evidence from rural Ethiopia

Abstract

This study examines the effect of smallholder farmers' access to a formal climate risk transfer mechanism on their risk preferences. Survey and experimental data were collected from smallholder farmers that have access to weather index-based crop insurance (WICI) in Ethiopia. We use an endogenous switching (ESP) model to address self-selection and simultaneity bias. Results from the ESP model show that farmers who purchased WICI are less likely to be riskaverse compared with non-purchaser farmers. Similarly, non-purchasers would have attained a significant reduction in their risk-aversion if they had taken up the insurance product. We also find that WICI has a positive and statistically significant effect on farmers' real-life risk-taking behavior as exemplified by mineral fertilizer use. The implication of our findings is that formal climate risk transfer mechanisms can positively influence households' economic decisions and outcomes, through reducing risk aversion. Therefore, they can possibly contribute to poverty alleviation and economic development within agrarian economies that are exposed to recurrent and severe climate shocks. JEL-Codes: C910, D030, I380, N270.

Natural disaster shock, risk aversion and corn farmers’ adoption of degradable mulch film: evidence from Zhangye, China

“…The possible reason for the above dispute is that they ignored the heterogeneity of farmers’ risk aversion. Specifically, Haile et al (2020) considered that small farmers with a strong sense of risk aversion are more inclined to manage climate risks. As the intensity of natural disaster risk increases, farmers with high-risk aversion tend to allocate the family income and labor resources, enhance agricultural investment and family labor and adopt DMF to alleviate low temperatures or drought risk damage.…”

Impact of Institutional Investors Investment Decisions on the Pakistan Stock Exchange

“…The selection of risk aversion attitude is much vital and important under some risky conditions like selection of risk under condition of ambiguity. Because in such condition the decision making can be confusing and definite harms can be bear, thus it is called important choice (Haile, Nillesen, & Tirivayi, 2020). The risk bearing attitude and selection of risky attitude based on the original situation.…”

Risk Preferences, Productive Investment and Straw Return Technology Adoption by Farmers in China

“…Existing literature has studied farmers' adoption of straw return technology from many aspects, such as householder age, gender, education (Ndiritu et al, 2014;Wu and Babcock, 1998), time preference (Mao et al, 2021), technical cognition (Lu et al, 2020), technology subsidies (Kurkalova et al, 2006), media channels and social interaction (Jiang et al, 2021), stability of land tenure (Gao et al, 2018), technical information (Hou et al, 2019), environmental cognition (Sattler and Nagel, 2010), and farm scale (Wu et al, 2018). Some studies have also confirmed that risk preferences are a key factor affecting farmers' adoption of agricultural production technology (Alpizar et al, 2011;Haile et al, 2020). However, few studies have analyzed risk preferences and farmers' adoption of straw return technology from the perspective of productive investment, i.e., whether they invest in new production technology or assets (tractors, in this paper).…”