2017
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.612.258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Front Line Demonstration (FLD) on Area and Productivity of Wheat Growers in Jabalpur District of Madhya Pradesh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It could be seen in Table 2, confirms that out of 150 beneficiary farmers, greater part 60.00 percent of the respondents had low increased their area under wheat cultivation followed by 22.67 percent of the respondents had medium change in area and only 17.33 percent of the respondents had high category of increased the area under wheat cultivation after adopting the recommended packages of practices of WFLDs. This finding is in line with Badodiya et al (2021) & Pyasi, and Sharma (2017)…”
Section: Sn Categoriessupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It could be seen in Table 2, confirms that out of 150 beneficiary farmers, greater part 60.00 percent of the respondents had low increased their area under wheat cultivation followed by 22.67 percent of the respondents had medium change in area and only 17.33 percent of the respondents had high category of increased the area under wheat cultivation after adopting the recommended packages of practices of WFLDs. This finding is in line with Badodiya et al (2021) & Pyasi, and Sharma (2017)…”
Section: Sn Categoriessupporting
confidence: 93%
“…It could be experiential that the table 1 shows that out of 150 beneficiary farmers, a large number, 50.00 percent of the respondents were having low (up to 3.8 q/ha) productivity increased, followed by 26.00 percent of the respondents had medium change (3.9-5.13 q/ha) in their productivity and only 24.00 percent respondent reported (5.14-6.5 q/ha) the yield increased in wheat cultivation after adopting the new technologies through WFLDs. Similar findings were also reported by Pyasi and Sharma (2017) and Singh (2017). It could be seen in Table 2, confirms that out of 150 beneficiary farmers, greater part 60.00 percent of the respondents had low increased their area under wheat cultivation followed by 22.67 percent of the respondents had medium change in area and only 17.33 percent of the respondents had high category of increased the area under wheat cultivation after adopting the recommended packages of practices of WFLDs.…”
Section: Sn Categoriessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…To compare the adoption behavior of green gram production technology among beneficiaries and nonbeneficiaries (FLD) Farmers Jatav (2010) Kangali (2012) revealed that in case of adopter of frontline demonstration of chickpea growers, majority of the farmers (50.00%) possessed partial adoption of total chickpea production technology considered in the study followed by (40.00%) farmers had full adoption and (10.00%) farmers had low adoption of chickpea production technology respectively. Kumari (2015) reported that majority of the FLD beneficiaries (58.00%) were having high adoption of wheat production technology. Whereas majority of non-FLD beneficiaries (50.00%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%