Impact of frontline demonstration in adoption of production technology and economics of tomato at farmers field of Tumakuru district

Desai, Nagappa; Mamatha, B.; Prashant, J. M.

doi:10.15740/has/tajh/11.2/349-354

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This is due to higher yield potential of Gajendra variety of elephant foot yam used in demonstration and improved package of practices applied during the growth period of the crop. These findings are similar of Desai et al (2016) [2] Verma et al (2016) [16] , and Dashora et al (2011) [3] . Before demonstration at the farmer's field this variety not very well known to the farmers and they were not aware of the improved technology for cultivation of this crop.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 91%

Impact of front-line demonstration on yield and economics of elephant foot yam (Amorphophallus paeoniifolius) in Mungeli District of Chhattisgarh

Jogi¹,

Lahre²

2020

J Pharmacogn Phytochem

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study on front line demonstration was conducted in Mungeli district of Chhattisgarh during 2017-2018 and 2018-2019. The demonstration was conducted at 10 farmer's field according to recommended package of practices of ICAR-Central Coastal Agricultural Research Institute, Goa. The demonstration was carried out with the objective to provide improved variety of Elephant foot yam and production technology to farmers with the aim to increase their income. The outcome of the study revealed that the average maximum demonstration practice yield was recorded 346 q /ha, whereas in farmers practice the yield was 236 q/ha. The percent increase in yield over farmer's practices was recorded 49.47. The average technology and extension gap were computed 220.50 q/ha and 118 q/ha respectively. The demonstration gave higher average net return Rs. 923250/-And B: C ratio is 2.84. The result showed that yield can be increased by adopting improved variety and recommended package of practices.

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 91%