2018
DOI: 10.1080/23311932.2018.1484200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of gamma radiation on the microbiological quality of smoke dry shrimp (Penaeus notialis) from three different water sources in Ghana

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial counts of molds and yeasts was down below the values reported by He et al. (2015) who indicated counts of mold and yeast of 6.2 × 10 2 CFU/g for FPH or (Akuamoah et al., 2018) with 10 5 CFU/g for smoke dry shrimp. There was a significant increase ( p > .05) in growth of molds and yeasts in shrimp hydrolysates samples stored 20 and 40 days at room temperature and 40 days at 4°C, with maximum values of 1 × 10 3 CFU/g.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…The initial counts of molds and yeasts was down below the values reported by He et al. (2015) who indicated counts of mold and yeast of 6.2 × 10 2 CFU/g for FPH or (Akuamoah et al., 2018) with 10 5 CFU/g for smoke dry shrimp. There was a significant increase ( p > .05) in growth of molds and yeasts in shrimp hydrolysates samples stored 20 and 40 days at room temperature and 40 days at 4°C, with maximum values of 1 × 10 3 CFU/g.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…161 While in many cases the content of the feed used in PCEs, such as commercial pelleted feed types, is not controlled directly within the study, the potential for pathogen introduction via this route should be considered. The use of gamma irradiated shrimp 162 originating from the experimental source population, or a population of known health status, as feed within a PCE, would eliminate the risk of introducing nonviable pathogen templates from commercial feed types, and additional, potentially viable pathogens via unprocessed feed types, into the experimental system. 163 Nonetheless, where possible, pathogen screening analysis should be conducted for the experimental feed as with the experimental animals.…”
Section: Feedmentioning
confidence: 99%