2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabet.2021.101226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of gender on relative rates of cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reliability of PMSI data has already been assessed and this database has previously been used to study patients with CV conditions. [9][10][11][12][13][14] Use of medication was identified from a 1/97 permanent random sample of the complete French nationwide claims database (Echantillon Généraliste de Bénéficiaires [general sample of healthcare beneficiaries]). This is another database, not linked to the PMSI database, and it has been used previously to study patients with diabetes in France.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reliability of PMSI data has already been assessed and this database has previously been used to study patients with CV conditions. [9][10][11][12][13][14] Use of medication was identified from a 1/97 permanent random sample of the complete French nationwide claims database (Echantillon Généraliste de Bénéficiaires [general sample of healthcare beneficiaries]). This is another database, not linked to the PMSI database, and it has been used previously to study patients with diabetes in France.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients had a period of 3 years (2010‐2012) to determine medical history. The reliability of PMSI data has already been assessed and this database has previously been used to study patients with CV conditions 9‐14 . Use of medication was identified from a 1/97 permanent random sample of the complete French nationwide claims database (Echantillon Généraliste de Bénéficiaires [general sample of healthcare beneficiaries]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 11 , 12 Two other large population-based cohort studies also presented absolute CVD risk in diabetic and non-diabetic individuals. 21 , 22 However, these studies mainly focused on sex differences in relative CVD risk without adequately quantifying sex differences in increase of absolute CVD risk. We calculated the increase in absolute risk from their data and report that excess risk with type-2 diabetes was greater in men than in women in the Danish resident registry [WMD: −1.95 (−2.60 to −1.30)] as well as in the French hospitalization cohort that pooled type-1 and type-2 diabetes together [WMD: −13.00 (−13.96 to −12.04)].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We calculated the increase in absolute risk from their data and report that excess risk with type-2 diabetes was greater in men than in women in the Danish resident registry [WMD: −1.95 (−2.60 to −1.30)] as well as in the French hospitalization cohort that pooled type-1 and type-2 diabetes together [WMD: −13.00 (−13.96 to −12.04)]. 21 , 22 Taken together, these data indicate that reducing type-2 diabetes on a population level would prevent CVD events in both sexes, with a potential greater prevention in men than in women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation