2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2005.06356
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Geo-distribution and Mining Pools on Blockchains: A Study of Ethereum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contribution of block propagation times to these websites are optional and do not represent all of the Ethereum network. Silva et al (2020) [18] conducted a month-long experiment from 1 April 2019 to 2 May 2019, collecting Ethereum network data, including block propagation times between geographically diverse nodes. We combined information from these three data sources for the prior probabilities, taking into account that changes in node latency and bandwidth will have an effect on block propagation time, which in turn has an effect on uncle rates.…”
Section: Page 31)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contribution of block propagation times to these websites are optional and do not represent all of the Ethereum network. Silva et al (2020) [18] conducted a month-long experiment from 1 April 2019 to 2 May 2019, collecting Ethereum network data, including block propagation times between geographically diverse nodes. We combined information from these three data sources for the prior probabilities, taking into account that changes in node latency and bandwidth will have an effect on block propagation time, which in turn has an effect on uncle rates.…”
Section: Page 31)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…asia refers to mining pools that are used broadly across Asia (including China, Japan, South Korea, and throughout Southeast Asia), while china is meant for pools used primarily by Chinese miners. 1: An excerpt of mappings from mining pools to regions based on data from Silva et al[57].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%