“…Broadly speaking, studies have assessed parameter sensitivity on trapping mechanisms, plume migration, and risk of leakage. More specifically, studies have measured model responses such as moment of inertia of the CO 2 plume (Sarkarfarshi et al, 2014); pressure (Ashraf et al, 2013;Birkholzer et al, 2009); boundary fluxes (Ashraf et al, 2010); mass of CO 2 in mobile, residual, or other phases (Ashraf et al, 2013;Han et al, 2011;Flett et al, 2007); distance of upslope CO 2 plume migration (Manceau and Rohmer, 2014;Gasda et al, 2012Gasda et al, , 2013; connected CO 2 volumes (Ashraf et al, 2010); and structural trapping volumes (Nilsen et al, 2012;Gasda et al, 2013). Various geomodels have been used, including synthetic models intended to represent realistic storage sites (e.g., a 2D box model (Han et al, 2011), a stratified model (Birkholzer et al, 2009), multiple plausible realizations of shallow-marine reservoirs (Ashraf et al, 2010), a dipping box model with a surface topography containing buried beach or offshore sand ridges combined with four different fault patterns (Nilsen et al, 2012)), as well as models of real sandstone formations (e.g., the Paris basin in France (Manceau and Rohmer, 2014), the Southern San Joaquin Valley in California, USA (Birkholzer et al, 2011)).…”