Impact of geriatric consultation teams on clinical outcome in acute hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

BackgroundComprehensive geriatric assessment for older patients admitted to dedicated wards has proven to be beneficial, but the impact of comprehensive geriatric assessment delivered by mobile inpatient geriatric consultation teams remains unclear. This review and meta-analysis aims to determine the impact of inpatient geriatric consultation teams on clinical outcomes of interest in older adults.MethodsAn electronic search of Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science and Invert for English, French and Dutch articles was performed from inception to June 2012. Three independent reviewers selected prospective cohort studies assessing functional status, readmission rate, mortality or length of stay in adults aged 60 years or older. Twelve studies evaluating 4,546 participants in six countries were identified. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed with the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies.ResultsThe individual studies show that an inpatient geriatric consultation team intervention has favorable effects on functional status, readmission and mortality rate. None of the studies found an effect on the length of the hospital stay. The meta-analysis found a beneficial effect of the intervention with regard to mortality rate at 6 months (relative risk 0.66; 95% confidence interval 0.52 to 0.85) and 8 months (relative risk 0.51; confidence interval 0.31 to 0.85) after hospital discharge.ConclusionsInpatient geriatric consultation team interventions have a significant impact on mortality rate at 6 and 8 months postdischarge, but have no significant impact on functional status, readmission or length of stay. The reason for the lack of effect on these latter outcomes may be due to insufficient statistical power or the insensitivity of the measuring method for, for example, functional status. The questions of to whom IGCT intervention should be targeted and what can be achieved remain unanswered and require further research.Trial registration: CRD42011001420 (http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO)

Orthogeriatrics in the management of frail older patients with a fragility fracture

“…Prospective randomised study of Shyu et al in Taiwan demonstrated that after introducing an orthogeriatric liaison service, patients with hip fracture had significantly better activities of daily living (ADLs) scores, were more likely to recover to their previous level of walking ability and also had fewer depressive symptoms [50]. The evidence supporting long-term functional improvement is weak, and a meta-analysis of 11 studies failed to demonstrate an improvement in long-term functional outcomes after implementation of an orthogeriatric model of care [71].…”

Derivation and Validation of Prognosis-Based Age Cutoffs to Define Elderly in Cardiac Surgery

“…By using the prognosis-driven age cutoffs validated in this study, as opposed to subjective age cutoffs, clinical care pathways and research protocols have a better starting point to target the elderly patients who may benefit from preoperative comprehensive geriatric assessment and optimization. 24,25 …”

The positive impact of interprofessional education: a controlled trial to evaluate a programme for health professional students

“…The coordinated and collaborative involvement of a team of health professionals is integral to meeting these multifaceted needs, as no single disciplinary skill set can deliver all of the care which is needed [6,7]. Collaborative team-based care has been found to improve outcomes for people with depression [8], diabetes [9], heart failure [10], hypertension [11], terminal cancer [12], and following acute geriatric hospital admissions [13].…”