2022
DOI: 10.1111/nph.18187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of global change on the plant microbiome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Disentangling which environmental factors contribute the most to variation in selection in plant populations and in the composition of microbial communities across large spatial scales is critical for predictions of how global change will impact plant fitness, microbiome assembly, as well as the interaction between plants and their associated microbial communities (Ramirez et al ., 2019; Thiergart et al ., 2020; Petipas et al ., 2021; Hacquard et al ., 2022). The present results suggest that differences in seasonal changes in climatic conditions (temperature, day length and PAR) between the two A. thaliana source populations are sufficient to explain the fitness advantage of the local over the nonlocal genotypes observed in reciprocal transplants between the two populations (Ågren & Schemske, 2012; Postma & Ågren, 2016; Thiergart et al ., 2020; Ellis et al ., 2021), whereas differences in below‐ground soil physicochemical composition and microbiome only weakly affect the relative fitness of the two genotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disentangling which environmental factors contribute the most to variation in selection in plant populations and in the composition of microbial communities across large spatial scales is critical for predictions of how global change will impact plant fitness, microbiome assembly, as well as the interaction between plants and their associated microbial communities (Ramirez et al ., 2019; Thiergart et al ., 2020; Petipas et al ., 2021; Hacquard et al ., 2022). The present results suggest that differences in seasonal changes in climatic conditions (temperature, day length and PAR) between the two A. thaliana source populations are sufficient to explain the fitness advantage of the local over the nonlocal genotypes observed in reciprocal transplants between the two populations (Ågren & Schemske, 2012; Postma & Ågren, 2016; Thiergart et al ., 2020; Ellis et al ., 2021), whereas differences in below‐ground soil physicochemical composition and microbiome only weakly affect the relative fitness of the two genotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tree with its associated microbiome-the collection of all microorganisms in a location-faces altered environmental conditions as a result of forest replacement and a rapidly changing climate. Characterizing the mechanisms shaping the tree microbiome is therefore required for a better understanding of tree fitness and adaptation to changing environments, and the ecology of forest ecosystems (Hacquard, 2016;Mishra et al, 2020;Hacquard et al, 2022). As tree roots are associated to hundreds of ECM fungi, there is a need to characterize the communities of bacteria and fungi inhabiting ECM roots (Garbaye, 1994;Perotto and Bonfante, 1997;Bending et al, 2002;Frey Klett et al, 2007;Marupakula et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes addressing issues of physiological responses of plants to their environment, how these are linked to changes at the genetic level, and how these changes at the whole plant level might translate into ecological impacts in natural or agroecosystems. Additionally, links between belowground factors (soil composition, rhizosphere interactions) and the plant microbiome (Hacquard et al, 2022) will be key to increasing plant health, defence and productivity under future climate conditions.…”
Section: Addressing Gaps In Our Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%