Impact of government size and corruption on economic growth

Abstract

This paper examines the role of government in economic growth by extending the neoclassical production-function by incorporating two dimensions of government such as, the size and quality. The size is measured by general government final consumption expenditures. The quality of governance is measured by the index of perception of corruption which is being tested in 12 countries in the MENA region in the period between 1998 and 2011. Our empirical results indicate that when the public sector is "too big", economic growth is negatively affected and that the relationship between corruption and economic growth is significantly negative with the bad effects of this phenomenon that include a loss of revenue for the state in the benefit of the individual, the increased costs related to the conduct of the affairs of the state, an inefficient use of public spending and stifling economic growth in the region. We argued then, that investments in the capacity which strengthened governance are a priority for improving the growth of the countries examined.

Bank Concentration and Economic Growth Nexus

“…By looking at the country-specific or macroeconomic control variables, trade openness (TO) shows a positively significant impact on Gpc in all models under Panel A, while gross capital formation (GCF) and government size (GS) are positively and negatively significant in Models (1) and (4), respectively. The findings are in line with existing literature that shows the negative impact of a large public sector on economic growth (Baklouti & Boujelbene, 2016;Nyasha & Odhiambo, 2019;Sheehey, 1993). In other words, the impact of GS depends on the relative size of the public sector and the level of Gpc.…”

Corruption, Government Spending and Economic Growth: The Case of Central and Eastern Europe

“…This research analysed a sample of 15 countries in Central and Eastern Europe, specifically Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, North Macedonia, Serbia, Slovakia, and Slovenia, between 2011 and 2021. The production function used in this model incorporated the size of government and corruption and is in the Cobb-Douglass production function form (Baklouti and Boujelbene, 2016;Pulok, 2010). The variable Y in the above specifications represents the real GDP per capita, a substitute for income per worker.…”