2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-020-00976-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of ground floor openings percentage on the dynamic response of typical Dutch URM cavity wall structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…al., 48 used to quantify the debris area and similarly used in other AEM applications. 5,99 The location of the debris is described as interior or exterior depending on their relative location to the footprint of the church at the end No data are presented for C2, as no collapses were observed. To compute the abovementioned quantities, AEM geometries were first exported as solids via .dwg files to the computer-aided design software Rhinoceros, 100 and then debris areas and volumes of each block manually calculated using embedded Rhinoceros commands.…”
Section: Collapse Analysis and Predicted Debris Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…al., 48 used to quantify the debris area and similarly used in other AEM applications. 5,99 The location of the debris is described as interior or exterior depending on their relative location to the footprint of the church at the end No data are presented for C2, as no collapses were observed. To compute the abovementioned quantities, AEM geometries were first exported as solids via .dwg files to the computer-aided design software Rhinoceros, 100 and then debris areas and volumes of each block manually calculated using embedded Rhinoceros commands.…”
Section: Collapse Analysis and Predicted Debris Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A polygon connecting debris elements by polylines comprises the extent of the debris distribution, a method informed by the collapse analysis completed by Domaneschi et. al., 48 used to quantify the debris area and similarly used in other AEM applications 5,99 . The location of the debris is described as interior or exterior depending on their relative location to the footprint of the church at the end of the signal.…”
Section: Collapse Analysis and Predicted Debris Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to AEM, a given URM structure is idealised as an assembly of rigid units connected by linear and nonlinear springs, where the mechanical properties of the system are lumped. The main characteristics of the proposed AEM-based modelling strategy are summarised below (Figure 2) while interested readers may refer to [8,9,10] for further details:…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a Gaussian-based AEM was also developed in order to obtain a low computational cost and a higher accuracy for progressive collapse analyses [12]. Recent applications of AEM addressed also the seismic behaviour of unreinforced masonry structures [2,[13][14][15][16][17][18], and blast loads on masonry [19] and masonry infill walls [20]. The AEM was adopted for several progressive collapse assessments for precast prestressed reinforced concrete beams [21,22] and steel moment frames structures [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%