2017
DOI: 10.1080/09639284.2017.1292465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of group exams in a graduate intermediate accounting class

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With 21 out of 24 students indicating that they would like to make use of assessment retakes in future, it is clear that the method was well received, as was the case in other studies on group assessments (Bay and Pacharn 2017). Apart from citing the opportunity to improve their marks, which provides a tangible and almost immediate benefit, most students cited improved understanding of the work as a result of the assessment retake.…”
Section: Student Acceptancementioning
confidence: 80%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…With 21 out of 24 students indicating that they would like to make use of assessment retakes in future, it is clear that the method was well received, as was the case in other studies on group assessments (Bay and Pacharn 2017). Apart from citing the opportunity to improve their marks, which provides a tangible and almost immediate benefit, most students cited improved understanding of the work as a result of the assessment retake.…”
Section: Student Acceptancementioning
confidence: 80%
“…In accounting education results in respect of improvement in performance due to cooperative learning have been mixed and team learning interventions have also not been as effective as in some other disciplines (Clinton and Kohlmeyer III 2005;Bay and Pacharn 2017). When Gabbin and Wood (2008) analysed literature on cooperative learning in accounting education, they found that only three of the 16 studies reported a significant improvement in performance.…”
Section: Cooperative Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations