2022
DOI: 10.1177/1358863x211065494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of habitual sedentary patterns on popliteal artery endothelial-dependent vasodilation in healthy adults

Abstract: Introduction: Acute, laboratory-based bouts of prolonged sitting attenuate lower-limb arterial endothelial-dependent vasodilation. However, the impact of habitual sedentary patterns on popliteal artery endothelial health is unclear. We tested the hypothesis that greater habitual total sedentary time, more time spent in prolonged sedentary bouts, and fewer sedentary breaks would be associated with worse popliteal flow-mediated dilation (FMD) responses. Methods: This cross-sectional study used 98 healthy partici… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…103 participants (52 females) were included in the present study. Some activPAL data have been previously published in a sub-sample of 73 (37 females) that evaluated the impact of habitual activity on peripheral vascular function 14 and the influence of sedentary activity on baroreflex sensitivity. 15 However, the current purpose and statistical analyses (i.e., comparison with aerobic fitness) are independent from these previous reports.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…103 participants (52 females) were included in the present study. Some activPAL data have been previously published in a sub-sample of 73 (37 females) that evaluated the impact of habitual activity on peripheral vascular function 14 and the influence of sedentary activity on baroreflex sensitivity. 15 However, the current purpose and statistical analyses (i.e., comparison with aerobic fitness) are independent from these previous reports.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Definitions of what angle constitutes sitting versus lying or bent-knee versus straight-legged are unclear, but the angles selected serve as likely reasonable heuristic thresholds in the absence of recommendations. Given the documented physiological differences [ 19 ] and separate international guidelines [ 2 , 3 ] for prolonged versus non-prolonged sedentary time, we examined time spent in sedentary postures separately for prolonged (i.e., >1 h) versus non-prolonged sedentary time (i.e., <1 h). In the absence of a strict definition of what is “prolonged”, 1 h was selected due to the established negative impact of sedentary bouts >1 h on leg blood flow [ 10 ], endothelial function [ 19 ], and arterial blood pressure [ 20 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this issue of the Journal, two studies in people without PAD demonstrated associations of prolonged uninterrupted sedentary time and fewer breaks during sedentary time with more adverse flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and microvascular or macrovascular function. [4][5][6] A systematic review reported that better aerobic fitness and regular exercise training were associated with more favorable measures of low-flow-mediated constriction, a measure of endothelial vasodilator function and of the decline in conduit artery diameter that occurs during the distal ischemic period of the FMD test. 6 Whether these vascular associations contribute to the biologic pathway for the association of greater sedentary time with higher rates of cardiovascular events requires further study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%