2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10311-018-0737-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of heavy metals and nanoparticles on aquatic biota

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
40
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 307 publications
0
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such different agglomeration behavior in seawater likely results in a different sedimentation rates 24 . Indeed, the heteroagglomeration of NP with NOM and other chemical contaminants promotes settlement to the seafloor and poses a threat to bottom-dwelling and filter-feeding organisms 41 . The increase in the concentration of TiO 2 NP in sediment is reported to be five orders of magnitude higher than that in surface water 42 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such different agglomeration behavior in seawater likely results in a different sedimentation rates 24 . Indeed, the heteroagglomeration of NP with NOM and other chemical contaminants promotes settlement to the seafloor and poses a threat to bottom-dwelling and filter-feeding organisms 41 . The increase in the concentration of TiO 2 NP in sediment is reported to be five orders of magnitude higher than that in surface water 42 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HMs are classified as toxic because they can penetrate water aquifers and consequently, agglomerate in the food chain 12–14 . It is important to mention that heavy metal toxicity is based on the fact that they are non-biodegradable, persistent, xenobiotic and can accumulate in humans over a time 1518 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the current study, the same decreasing order of toxicity to trochophore and veliger was Cu > Zn ≫ Cd, correspondingly supported by those indicated in H. rubra and H. rufescens (Gorski & Nugegoda, 2006; Hunt & Anderson, 1989). One possible explanation of the metals toxicity difference is that Cu and Zn have higher oxidation activity, while Cd is relatively inert metal (Kahlon et al., 2018). Evidence also showed that Cu and Zn raised metallothionein concentrations in adult Pacific abalone, but Cd did not (Lee & Nam, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%