2014
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1309389111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of heterogeneity and socioeconomic factors on individual behavior in decentralized sharing ecosystems

Abstract: Tens of millions of individuals around the world use decentralized content distribution systems, a fact of growing social, economic, and technological importance. These sharing systems are poorly understood because, unlike in other technosocial systems, it is difficult to gather large-scale data about user behavior. Here, we investigate user activity patterns and the socioeconomic factors that could explain the behavior. Our analysis reveals that (i) the ecosystem is heterogeneous at several levels: content ty… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As said above, many of our conclusions validate results already identified in previous works. Examples of known results that are confirmed or extended by our measurements include: (i) the slow increasing trend on traffic per user [7]; (ii) the predominance of video traffic [1,13]; (iii) the fast increase in HTTPS deployment [14]; (iv) the decline of P2P [18,28]; (v) the concentration of Internet traffic around few big players [25]; (vi) the deployment of experimental protocols resulting in sudden changes in the traffic mix due to bugs and private tests by large companies [24,26,34].…”
Section: Related Worksupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As said above, many of our conclusions validate results already identified in previous works. Examples of known results that are confirmed or extended by our measurements include: (i) the slow increasing trend on traffic per user [7]; (ii) the predominance of video traffic [1,13]; (iii) the fast increase in HTTPS deployment [14]; (iv) the decline of P2P [18,28]; (v) the concentration of Internet traffic around few big players [25]; (vi) the deployment of experimental protocols resulting in sudden changes in the traffic mix due to bugs and private tests by large companies [24,26,34].…”
Section: Related Worksupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Interestingly, FTTH subscribers start abandoning P2P applications earlier in terms of volume. Based on findings of previous studies [18,28], a conjecture to explain this decline is that the availability of cheap, easy and legal platforms to access content is finally contributing to the downfall of P2P. In the following we explore this conjecture.…”
Section: The Downfall Of Peer-to-peer -Finallymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The recent growth of this disruptive economic model has been spurred by internet connectivity and the proliferation of mobile computing and online social networking platforms 36 . These innovations allow people to connect in technologically mediated social networks and exchange resources in a peer-to-peer fashion 79 . Indeed, it is expected that individuals and local communities will organically play a key role in these decentralized sharing systems 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using empirical telephone call and e-mail data, Karsai et al argue that burstiness slows the spread of epidemics [18]. Although the effect of burstiness has been empirically and analytically studied [19][20][21][22][23][24], much remains unknown so far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%