2018
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.9322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of hexamine addition to a nitrite‐based additive on fermentation quality, Clostridia and Saccharomyces cerevisiae in a white lupin‐wheat silage

Abstract: The addition of hexamine did not improve silage quality compared with a solution of sodium nitrite. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only significant difference in the Clostridium : total bacteria and Clostridium : Lactobacillus ratios was noted in treatment LPa + LPl, which was characterized by the highest content of butyric acid. These relationships were confirmed using other ensiling plants, with methods similar to those used in this study, by König et al …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The only significant difference in the Clostridium : total bacteria and Clostridium : Lactobacillus ratios was noted in treatment LPa + LPl, which was characterized by the highest content of butyric acid. These relationships were confirmed using other ensiling plants, with methods similar to those used in this study, by König et al …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Hexamethylene tetraamine releases formaldehyde which can react in diverse ways with amino acids, proteins and enzymes. However, according to Knicky and Spörndly (2009) and König et al (2019), the addition of HMTA to SN-mixtures did not improve silage quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In this sense, the pH observed (3.60) is suitable for forage conservation, since pH values between 3.6 and 4.2 are considered ideal (MCDONALD, 1991). However, the high moisture content in the silage allows the presence of Enterobacteria and Clostridium (KÖNIG et al, 2018). These microorganisms, despite not being able to develop in acidic environments, are able to resist such conditions, due to water activity in the silo (BRITO et al, 2020), which can lead to qualitative and quantitative losses of silages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%