2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of high field (3.0T) magnetic resonance imaging on diagnosis of osteochondral defects in the ankle joint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Improved image quality with increased SNR makes 3.0 T MR a potential tool to diagnose joint pathology that previously was only suspected or missed [15-17, 25, 26]. A previous study comparing 3.0 T versus 1.0 T found that artificially created osteochondral defects in three isolated talus specimens were better visualized at 3.0 T [27]. Furthermore, the results of Masi et al demonstrated that 3.0 T performed better than 1.5 T in assessing porcine cartilage lesions [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Improved image quality with increased SNR makes 3.0 T MR a potential tool to diagnose joint pathology that previously was only suspected or missed [15-17, 25, 26]. A previous study comparing 3.0 T versus 1.0 T found that artificially created osteochondral defects in three isolated talus specimens were better visualized at 3.0 T [27]. Furthermore, the results of Masi et al demonstrated that 3.0 T performed better than 1.5 T in assessing porcine cartilage lesions [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…19,20,21,36 However, only a paucity of data exists regarding the ankle. 18,22 MR imaging of the ankle is particularly challenging because of the small volume and high complexity of the joint; thus high spatial resolution is needed. It is not known if the advantages of MR imaging at higher field strengths (ie, higher SNR, better fat saturation) outweigh the disadvantages as higher chemical shift and larger susceptibility artifacts at small FOV imaging.…”
Section: Bauer Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imaging at 3.0 T has been identified as having potential in optimizing these parameters in musculoskeletal imaging, yielding higher diagnostic accuracy. [15][16][17][18][19] In particular, visualization of pathologic cartilage lesions at the knee was better at 3.0 T. 20,21 However, to our knowledge, no study yet assessed the potential benefits of 3.0 T in assessing ligament pathology at the ankle, and only few data exist regarding the assessment of ankle cartilage pathology at 3.0 T. 17,22 Thus the purpose of this study was to compare previously optimized imaging protocols at 1.5 T and 3.0 T concerning the diagnostic performance in assessing cartilage and ligament pathology of the ankle. …”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Current and ongoing development of higher field strength can be observed and a new clinical standard of 3.0 Tesla seems to be being established. 22,23,[52][53][54] High-field MRI allows increased resolution while maintaining the same scan time. In addition, the development of parallel imaging allows shorter scan times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%