2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.06.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of histological subtype on survival of patients with surgically-treated stage IA2–IIB cervical cancer: Adenocarcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
65
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
65
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although histological types have been suggested as independent prognostic factors (Mabuchi, 2012;, no significant differences in OS were found in our population. In agreement with Bradbury et al we found significant correlation of OS with lymph node metastasis but not extrauterine invasion (Table III) (Bradbury, 2015), although other authors reported significant correlation of parametrial involvement with disease-free and overall survival (Jiamset, 2016 (Mao, 2016).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…Although histological types have been suggested as independent prognostic factors (Mabuchi, 2012;, no significant differences in OS were found in our population. In agreement with Bradbury et al we found significant correlation of OS with lymph node metastasis but not extrauterine invasion (Table III) (Bradbury, 2015), although other authors reported significant correlation of parametrial involvement with disease-free and overall survival (Jiamset, 2016 (Mao, 2016).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…In this study, women with stage IIA2 cervical cancer had a higher rate of positive LVSI than those with stage IIA1 (71.9% vs 52.5, p=0.05). Also, some studies have suggested that adenocarcinoma histology is associated with poorer outcome compared to squamous histology (Lai et al, 1999;Takeda et al, 2002;Macdonald et al, 2009;Mabuchi et al, 2012). In the current study, the higher incidence of adenocarcinoma histology in stage IIA2 cervical cancer was also demonstrated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are conflicting reports in the literature about the effect of CCRT on cervical AC/ASC. Some studies have shown that CCRT is beneficial for cervical AC/ASC [20]- [23], while other studies have reported that CCRT does not improve the survival of patients with risk factors, such as lymph node metastasis [22] [23]. In this study, we showed that CCRT did not improve the survival of patients compared with either RT or CT alone, regardless of lymph node metastasis (Figure 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%