“…Numerical strategies aiming to outperform MCS in terms of computational efficiency include quasi-MC (Caflisch, 1998), multilevel MC (Giles et al, 2015), and various stochastic finite element methods (Xiu, 2010). While widely used in practice, including for subsurface-related applications (e.g., Ciriello et al, 2017;Dodwell et al, 2015;Liodakis et al, 2018; and the references therein), under certain conditions such methods 10.1029/2019WR026090 can be slower than MCS. For example, multilevel MC might become slower than regular MC when estimating a system state's distribution to the same accuracy (Giles et al, 2015), and polynomial chaos-based techniques have been shown to underperform MC if random parameter fields in (nonlinear) models exhibit short correlation lengths and/or high variances (Barajas-Solano & Tartakovsky, 2016).…”