2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2020.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of hysteresis on caloric cooling performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to its influence on operating pressure, hysteresis adversely impacts the second-law efficiency and coefficient of performance (COP) of any caloric cooling cycle because of dissipative heat losses 16 , 17 . The impact of hysteresis on efficiency can be quantified by calculating an idealized thermodynamic efficiency, η —relative to the Carnot efficiency—with a simple material model that accounts for dissipative losses due to hysteresis in a Carnot-like cycle 16 : …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to its influence on operating pressure, hysteresis adversely impacts the second-law efficiency and coefficient of performance (COP) of any caloric cooling cycle because of dissipative heat losses 16 , 17 . The impact of hysteresis on efficiency can be quantified by calculating an idealized thermodynamic efficiency, η —relative to the Carnot efficiency—with a simple material model that accounts for dissipative losses due to hysteresis in a Carnot-like cycle 16 : …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These transitions, however, often have large thermal hysteresis, occur away from ambient temperature, or have only moderate sensitivity to applied pressure. This highlights a longstanding challenge across all classes of caloric materials: field-induced phase transitions that lead to large isothermal entropy and adiabatic temperature changes are often accompanied by substantial hysteresis, which increases the magnitude of the applied field required to capture the full entropy of the transition and reduces the efficiency of each cooling cycle 14 17 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the uncertainty associated with extracting unit-cell parameters from powder patterns within the phase co-existence region, we estimate that the upper bound for the width of the hysteresis loop is 30 bar. It is worth emphasizing that isothermal hysteresis loops, which are more directly relevant to pressure-induced cooling cycles than isobaric hysteresis loops, are rarely reported for barocaloric materials that undergo first-order phase transitions, , presumably due to the challenge of inducing a fully reversible phase change at easily accessible pressures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These transitions, however, often have large thermal hysteresis, occur away from ambient temperature, or have only moderate sensitivity to applied pressure. This highlights a longstanding challenge across all classes of caloric materials: field-induced phase transitions that lead to large isothermal entropy and adiabatic temperature changes are often accompanied by substantial hysteresis, which increases the magnitude of the applied field required to capture the full entropy of the transition and reduces the efficiency of each cooling cycle [12][13][14][15] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to its influence on operating pressure, hysteresis adversely impacts the second-law efficiency and coefficient of performance (COP) of any caloric cooling cycle because of dissipative heat losses 14,15 . The impact of hysteresis on efficiency can be quantified by calculating an idealized thermodynamic efficiency, h-relative to the Carnot efficiency-with a simple material model that accounts for dissipative losses due to hysteresis in a Carnot-like cycle 14 :…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%