2021
DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnaa475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Implementing an Academic Detailing Program on Opioid-Benzodiazepine Co-Prescribing Trends at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

Abstract: Objectives To assess the process and outcomes of academic detailing to enhance the Opioid Safety Initiative and the Psychotropic Drug Safety Initiative to reduce co-prescribing of opioid-benzodiazepine combinations in veterans. Methods A retrospective cohort design was conducted to evaluate the impact of implementing an academic detailing program on opioid-benzodiazepine co-prescribing between October 2014 through March 2019 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within VA, programs have tackled high-risk opioid and sedative co-prescribing and may have slowed the increase in these use disorders as a result. [30][31][32] In addition, VA's move from ICD-9 to ICD-10 in 2015, and discussions around the changing definitions of substance-specific disorders with the release of DSM-5, may have curbed the increasing trend in diagnosed disorders. It is less likely the trends reflect an increase in systematic underdiagnosis of opioid or sedative use disorders.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Within VA, programs have tackled high-risk opioid and sedative co-prescribing and may have slowed the increase in these use disorders as a result. [30][31][32] In addition, VA's move from ICD-9 to ICD-10 in 2015, and discussions around the changing definitions of substance-specific disorders with the release of DSM-5, may have curbed the increasing trend in diagnosed disorders. It is less likely the trends reflect an increase in systematic underdiagnosis of opioid or sedative use disorders.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnoses for these disorders leveled off during a period of increased recognition of the opioid crisis and the risks of polypharmacy. Within VA, programs have tackled high‐risk opioid and sedative co‐prescribing and may have slowed the increase in these use disorders as a result 30–32 . In addition, VA's move from ICD‐9 to ICD‐10 in 2015, and discussions around the changing definitions of substance‐specific disorders with the release of DSM‐5, may have curbed the increasing trend in diagnosed disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%