2019
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msz184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of In Vivo Protein Folding Probability on Local Fitness Landscapes

Abstract: It is incompletely understood how biophysical properties like protein stability impact molecular evolution and epistasis. Epistasis is defined as specific when a mutation exclusively influences the phenotypic effect of another mutation, often at physically interacting residues. In contrast, nonspecific epistasis results when a mutation is influenced by a large number of nonlocal mutations. As most mutations are pleiotropic, the in vivo folding probability—governed by basal protein stability—is thought to deter… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analogous behavior observed for these mutants in E. coli and correlation of misfolding effects with phylogenetic conservation is consistent with a selective pressure to avoid misfolding in vivo and with growing evidence that kinetic factors affect stable protein expression in cells (Fig. 3K) (20,26,60,61). The strong dependence of activity on temperature and Zn 2+ concentration present during expression suggests that mutations promoting formation of the inactive state may disrupt co-translational folding (20,62).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The analogous behavior observed for these mutants in E. coli and correlation of misfolding effects with phylogenetic conservation is consistent with a selective pressure to avoid misfolding in vivo and with growing evidence that kinetic factors affect stable protein expression in cells (Fig. 3K) (20,26,60,61). The strong dependence of activity on temperature and Zn 2+ concentration present during expression suggests that mutations promoting formation of the inactive state may disrupt co-translational folding (20,62).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Epistatic relationships becomes crucial when comparing homologous protein families or protein domains, which can exhibit significant sequence variation and biochemical properties that may span orders of magnitude while still maintaining a similar three-dimensional (3-D) fold [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. Thus, single or dual mutations on homologous proteins yield a wide range of functional outcomes [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. In fact, understanding the mechanics or predicting the results of dual mutations remains a significant challenge in the presence of systems which experience large epistatic effects, even when accurate experimental data are available for the single mutant systems [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, most extant homologs differ at multiple positions, which may have significant non-additivity ("epistasis") that confounds detection of signals associated with single amino acid changes (e.g. (11,(78)(79)(80)(81)(82)(83)(84)). Nevertheless, these approaches may be useful for identifying sets of positions that are enriched in each substitution class for further experimental consideration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%