2012
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2011.2173446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Incomplete and Inaccurate Data Models on High Resolution Parameter Estimation in Multidimensional Channel Sounding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the very small wavelength highly accurate positioners on the order of a fraction of a wavelength to synthesize the array, and sources with low phase noise and high stability would be needed to apply high resolution estimation algorithms. Multiple antenna measurements enable the estimation of the specular multipath component (SMC) parameters including the AoD and AoA using high resolution algorithms such as SAGE [43] or RIMAX [33] [44]. A drawback of SAGE is that 1) the computational load is dependent on the covariance matrix size which can be excessively huge for typical MIMO measurements and 2) it only assumes additive white Gaussian noise in the model and thus does not include dense multipath components (DMC).…”
Section: Mm-wave Channel Soundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the very small wavelength highly accurate positioners on the order of a fraction of a wavelength to synthesize the array, and sources with low phase noise and high stability would be needed to apply high resolution estimation algorithms. Multiple antenna measurements enable the estimation of the specular multipath component (SMC) parameters including the AoD and AoA using high resolution algorithms such as SAGE [43] or RIMAX [33] [44]. A drawback of SAGE is that 1) the computational load is dependent on the covariance matrix size which can be excessively huge for typical MIMO measurements and 2) it only assumes additive white Gaussian noise in the model and thus does not include dense multipath components (DMC).…”
Section: Mm-wave Channel Soundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antenna has a non-uniform beampattern in elevation, with a beamwidth (full-width halfmaximum, FWHM) of ∼ 90°. Note that due to the SIMO setup, extraction of angles of departure is not possible, which may be one of the error sources in the extraction of the MPC parameters [15] when the antenna characteristics are not separable in angle and frequency; the campaign in this paper kept the error small by measuring in outdoor scenarios with limited elevation spread.…”
Section: Sounder Calibration and Measurement A Channel Soundermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason is because cross-polarized ports in RX had failed to provide consistent radiation patterns during calibration due to high noise sensitivity (TX is vertically polarized). Note that the lack of dual-polarization at TX and RX might also contribute to modeling errors [15]. Each vertically polarized port has azimuth beamwidth of 50°and elevation beamwidth of 100°(see Fig.…”
Section: Sounder Calibration and Measurement A Channel Soundermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this, we generate the synthetic channel transfer functions using (2) 1 , the phase drift was modeled as a random-walk process and added to the transfer functions, as done in [36]. For the simulations, we used the same setup as the actual better resolution, they are relatively more sensitive to any model mismatches [38], [39]. 2 We now briefly describe the channel propagation model and the algorithm for parameter extraction: Let B T (φ, ψ) and B R (φ, ψ) respectively be the N T × 1 and 1 × N R calibrated vertically polarized beam patterns of the transmit and receive arrays, for different azimuth and elevation angles.…”
Section: ) Phase Drift Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%