2020
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of infection in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: insight from a multicentre observational cohort from China

Abstract: ObjectiveWe aimed to describe the association between in-hospital infection and prognosis among patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) who received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).DesignThis observational cohort originated from a database of patients with NSTE-ACS who underwent PCI from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2014.SettingFive centres in South China.ParticipantsThis multicentre observational cohort study consecutively included 8197 patients with NSTE-ACS who received P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous data about the incidence of bacterial infection during ACS are controversial with rates ranging between 4% and 15% [15,16]. We set an occurrence rate of bacterial infection around 6% and supposed that the occurrence of bacterial infection would be at least 3 times higher in ACS patients with baseline (before the clinical signs of infection) procalcitonin above the cut-off for normal levels as compared to those with procalcitonin in the range of normality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous data about the incidence of bacterial infection during ACS are controversial with rates ranging between 4% and 15% [15,16]. We set an occurrence rate of bacterial infection around 6% and supposed that the occurrence of bacterial infection would be at least 3 times higher in ACS patients with baseline (before the clinical signs of infection) procalcitonin above the cut-off for normal levels as compared to those with procalcitonin in the range of normality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%