2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-287-381-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Information Society Research in the Global South

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 173 publications
(247 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We would like to nevertheless acknowledge that digital divide and digital access are influenced by much more that just physical access (Dodel 2015;Selwyn 2004) and therefore this study requires a follow-up into questions of usage, appropriation and outcomes in order to provide policy makers and planners with a more comprehensive understanding of how spatial, social and economic factors can be influencing digital divide at the intra-urban scale. Clarifications and notes on data Location Quotient (LQ) as applied in this study is explained below:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We would like to nevertheless acknowledge that digital divide and digital access are influenced by much more that just physical access (Dodel 2015;Selwyn 2004) and therefore this study requires a follow-up into questions of usage, appropriation and outcomes in order to provide policy makers and planners with a more comprehensive understanding of how spatial, social and economic factors can be influencing digital divide at the intra-urban scale. Clarifications and notes on data Location Quotient (LQ) as applied in this study is explained below:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent literature review of the field of digital divide studies has shown that the concept is often defined as access and use of ICT technologies, invoking as well factors that can influence its use, namely skills, access to technology, education, etc. More recent definitions also focus on digital divide as referring to the social stratification that results from the difference in access, and ability to produce new knowledge in the interaction with ICTs (Hanafizadeh et al 2013), or what Dodel (2015) refers to as the three stages of hierarchical digital achievements (access, usage and appropriation). Emerging ICT services in urban areas present a mix of opportunities and threat of exclusion of certain segments of the city and can function as an ''amplifier of other social and economic factors and processes'' (Hanafizadeh et al 2013: 47).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are meant to stimulate consistent research undertakings in ICTs and socio-economic development growth in Ghana among researchers, students and practitioners in Ghana. Indeed, Ordóñez (2015) proposes a set of questions which need to be explored in ICT for development research, particularly, that which "focuses on finding policy options and understanding the factors that may affect them and successfully implement them" (p. 79). To ensure and enhance the value, relevance and utility of ICT research questions, findings and outputs for both policy and practice, Harris (2015) also suggests among other things interactions between researchers and stakeholders at various levels as well as sharing and publishing experiences of how research results have been used for policymaking and practice.…”
Section: Policy Initiativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are meant to stimulate and encourage consistent and research undertakings on ICTs and socio-economic development and growth in Ghana among ICT for development researchers, students, and practitioners. Indeed, Ordóñez (2015) proposes a set of questions which need to be explored in ICT for development research, particularly research which "focuses on finding policy options and understanding the factors that may affect them and successfully implement them" (p. 79).To ensure and enhance the value, relevance, and utility of ICT research questions, findings and outputs for both policy and practice, Harris (2015) also suggests, among other things, interactions between researchers and stakeholders at various levels as well as sharing and publishing experiences of how research results have been used for policy-making and practice. Ultimately, the value and relevance of the research agenda proposed here reside in the extent to which it contributes to building a body of thought, knowledge, and understanding of the ICT landscape and produce empirical data for evidence-based policy reformulation or adjustments of policies, strategic actions, and practice to effectively harness ICTs for socio-economic development, growth, and well-being among the population of Ghana.…”
Section: Capacity Building Initiativesmentioning
confidence: 99%