2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.asieco.2022.101526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of institutional determinants on income inequalities in Indonesia during the Era Reformasi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kouadio and Gakpa (2022) demonstrate that petty corruption, sounder bureaucratic quality, and a more efficient judicial system are growth fundamentals, narrowing the income gap. Similar results were found by Szczepaniak et al (2022) during the Period Reformasi in Indonesia. Blancheton and Chhorn (2021) explain that higher public spending increases the income gap at the initial level of institutional development.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Kouadio and Gakpa (2022) demonstrate that petty corruption, sounder bureaucratic quality, and a more efficient judicial system are growth fundamentals, narrowing the income gap. Similar results were found by Szczepaniak et al (2022) during the Period Reformasi in Indonesia. Blancheton and Chhorn (2021) explain that higher public spending increases the income gap at the initial level of institutional development.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…investigated the influence of institutional quality on income inequality in Africa from 1990 to 2017, discovering that institutional quality factors significantly reduce income inequality. Pursuing similar themes,Szczepaniak et al (2022) demonstrated that changes in institutional factors, such as economic freedom, regulatory quality and voice and accountability, considerably decreased income inequalities in the case of Indonesia. Finally,Dossou et al…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This article pertains to the amendment of paragraph (1) of Article 20 to increase the lucidity of its provisions. By the stipulations outlined in the statutory regulations, administrative sanctions shall be imposed on any state administrator who contravenes the provisions referenced in Article 5, points 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 (Szczepaniak, Geise, and Bariyah 2022). Moreover, by applicable regulations, the Corruption Eradication Commission may endorse administrative sanctions against the state official in question to the chief of the institution or direct superior to whom the state official is subordinate.…”
Section: The Role Of State Official Wealth Report To Realize the Gene...mentioning
confidence: 99%