2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of insulin pump therapy on long-term glycemic control in a pediatric Spanish cohort

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
14
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The strength of this study is that although it is not a RCT, it analyses “real‐world” outcomes of a large population‐based cohort over a longer duration than previously reported. It differs from other pediatric studies which often include only a small number of patients, have a much shorter follow‐up time, and do not include a control group (patients on injection therapy) . Furthermore, data in this study come from a population‐based database with high case ascertainment, and pairs were matched with a random‐sampling algorithm that minimizes a potential selection bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The strength of this study is that although it is not a RCT, it analyses “real‐world” outcomes of a large population‐based cohort over a longer duration than previously reported. It differs from other pediatric studies which often include only a small number of patients, have a much shorter follow‐up time, and do not include a control group (patients on injection therapy) . Furthermore, data in this study come from a population‐based database with high case ascertainment, and pairs were matched with a random‐sampling algorithm that minimizes a potential selection bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It differs from other pediatric studies which often include only a small number of patients, have a much shorter follow-up time, and do not include a control group (patients on injection therapy). [6][7][8][9][10] Furthermore, data in this study come from a population-based database with high case ascertainment, and pairs were matched with a random-sampling algorithm that minimizes a potential selection bias. There are few pediatric randomized controlled trials comparing patients on pump therapy and patients on injection therapy, and all have a duration of less than 1 year.…”
Section: Severe Hypoglycemia and Dkamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, CSII efficacy and safety could not be analyzed due to the lack of a control group and missing data. While CSII treatment is well established and has been shown to decrease the HbA1c level compared to MDI [ 18 20 ], a recent study does not support a policy of providing an insulin pump to a patient with poor glycemic control until that patient’s level of engagement in self-management has been determined [ 21 ]. Our findings show an average reduction of HbA1c levels of − 1.6% at 1 year after of CSII initiation, with a reduction of − 1.9% achieved in patients using the MiniMed ® 640 G model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nie stwierdziliśmy różnicy pomiędzy grupami w wartości HbA1c przy rozpoznaniu. W przeciwieństwie do naszych wyników badacze z Hiszpanii zauważyli, że im gorsze wyrównanie metaboliczne przy podłączeniu pompy insulinowej, tym większy spadek HbA1c [15]. Niemniej jednym ze wskazań do podłączenia pompy insulinowej zgodnie z wytycznymi PTD są trzymające się podwyższone wartości HbA1c>6,5%, ale<9,0%, u pacjenta dobrze wyedukowanego, współpracującego oraz przestrzegającego zasad samokontroli [5].…”
Section: Dyskusjaunclassified