2003
DOI: 10.1117/12.485380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of inter-mask CD error on OPC accuracy for resolutions of 90 nm and below

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is remarkable because the technical demands to photomasks have become very high these days for all aspects of maskmaking such as linewidth control-to-target (especially in cases of high mask-error-factor (MEF); see Ref. [1]), overlay matching (especially for double-patterning schemes), and defect control. Especially, contamination of photomasks that occurs in the wafer production line under the influence of 248 and especially 193 DUV light sources, so-called haze contamination-is of increasing importance and leads to periodic re-inspection needs of the mask with a continuous yield risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is remarkable because the technical demands to photomasks have become very high these days for all aspects of maskmaking such as linewidth control-to-target (especially in cases of high mask-error-factor (MEF); see Ref. [1]), overlay matching (especially for double-patterning schemes), and defect control. Especially, contamination of photomasks that occurs in the wafer production line under the influence of 248 and especially 193 DUV light sources, so-called haze contamination-is of increasing importance and leads to periodic re-inspection needs of the mask with a continuous yield risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course there has been manufacturability attention but that is usually only related to the single layer of the design that is used per mask such as the effects of the mask-error-enhancement-factor (MEEF) on printability (Ref. [2]). Such information is usually used to tighten the specifications of photomasks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since, most of the time, the two-dimensional mask error information is not available, it usually is not taken into consideration when correlating GDS layout dimensions to real silicon measurement, during OPC model generation. Also, inter-mask CD error, which is the critical dimension difference between a test mask and a product mask, can also impact OPC accuracy (6) . Secondly, there are difficulties in accurately quantifying the twodimensional proximity effect on silicon, and usually a significant error is contributed from CD SEM measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%