2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2005.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of interchanging VOCs on the performance of trickle bed air biofilter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was found that the conditions were more favorable for EA biodegradation than aromatic VOCs. Similar conclusions were also obtained for the mixtures of oxygenated and aromatic VOCs by other researchers [36][37][38]. It was considered that pollutants with high Henry's constant were more difficult to eliminate in BTF, because these pollutants had an unfavorable gas-liquid partition and the pollutants concentrations in the biofilm were too low to sustain a high biodegradation rate [13].…”
Section: Removal Efficiencies Of Vocssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…It was found that the conditions were more favorable for EA biodegradation than aromatic VOCs. Similar conclusions were also obtained for the mixtures of oxygenated and aromatic VOCs by other researchers [36][37][38]. It was considered that pollutants with high Henry's constant were more difficult to eliminate in BTF, because these pollutants had an unfavorable gas-liquid partition and the pollutants concentrations in the biofilm were too low to sustain a high biodegradation rate [13].…”
Section: Removal Efficiencies Of Vocssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…However, when the change was on the order of 50 ppmv, the TBABs' performances increased without the need of any acclimation periods. This is in concordance with findings of Kim et al (2005a). They demonstrated that hydrophilic compounds were degraded easily and deposited additional cell mass in the biofilter, while degradation of hydrophobic compounds was retarded until biological cultures produced a sufficient RNA or enzyme/protein to utilize these compounds.…”
Section: Performance Of Tbabs a And Bsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This test confirmed that the diffusion limited, zero order model was the best for this application because the variation of the experimental constant was smallest (in the tables, the best cases are shown in bold type). However, it was interesting to note that other work (Kim et al, 2005), which studied styrene removal in a more complex mixture, favoured a first order model with a rate constant of 0.044 s -1 compared to the 0.04 s -1 averaged figure reported (Table 2). Experiment ii---with Pall rings (15×15×1 mm) and changes in the inlet concentration of styrene while keeping the inlet acetone concentration constant (at 50 mg/m 3 ).…”
Section: Steady Statementioning
confidence: 96%