Sleeping exposes lizards to predation. Therefore, sleeping strategies must be directed towards avoiding predation and might vary among syntopic species. We studied sleeping site characteristics of two syntopic, congeneric lizards -the Bay Island forest lizard, Coryphophylax subcristatus and the short-tailed Bay Island lizard, C. brevicaudus and evaluated inter-specific differences. We measured structural, microclimatic and potential predator avoidance at the sleeping perches of 386 C. subcristatus and 185 C. brevicaudus.Contrary to our expectation, we found similar perch use in both species. The lizards appeared to use narrow girth perch plants and accessed perches by moving both vertically and horizontally. Most lizards slept on leaves, with their heads directed towards the potential path of a predator approaching from the plant base. There was no inter-specific competition in the choices of sleeping perches. These choices indicate an anti-predator strategy involving both tactile and visual cues. This study provides insight into a rarely studied behaviour in reptiles and its adaptive significance. 154 and the head direction (inward, outward or perpendicular) of the lizards. We classified the head 155 direction (Fig. 3) with respect to the trunk when the perching substrate was a branch (e.g., inward 156 = head towards the trunk), with respect to the petiole when the substrate was a leaf (e.g., outward 157 = away from the petiole/plant base; perpendicular = across the leaf axis), and with respect to the 158 ground if the substrate was the trunk (e.g., outward = away from the ground). We measured 159 distance to nearest plant in the escape direction of the individual. The escape direction of an 160 individual was assumed to be between 0 о to 180 о in front of its head (NPM and SH personal 161 observations). The nearest point on the adjacent plant was considered to be on the same plane as 162 or below the lizard. We measured all distances using a measuring tape with 0.1 cm precision. Inter-specific and intra-specific variations 226 We found significant differences in perch characteristics between the two species but effect sizes 227 in all the comparisons were small ( Table 2). The two species showed distinct patterns in the way 228 they accessed perches (Fig.4). While both species moved similar distances vertically, C.229 subcristatus accessed perches away from the trunk (Fig.4). In contrast, C. brevicaudus used 230 perches close to the trunk (Fig.4). We found that vertical distance contributed relatively more to the total distance moved 232 than horizontal distance (Fig.4). After controlling for girth of perch plants, body size positively 237 brevicaudus (R 2 = 0.01, β = -2.13, SE = 1.65, p = 0.19) and had a statistically significant but 238 small effect size in case of C. subcristatus (R 2 = 0.02, r = -0.14, β = -2.1, SE = 0.73, p = 0.004).
239We found no difference between males and females of C. subcristatus with respect to 243 Site fidelity 244 We redetected eight out of the ten marked individuals of C. subc...