1997
DOI: 10.1007/s002710050041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of irrigation timing on simulated water-crop production functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stewart et al (1977) and Doorenbos and Kassam (1979) predicted relative yield reductions from the product of relative evapotranspiration deficits and a crop-specific yield response factor or yield reduction ratio. This approach has been used extensively to estimate relative yield from inadequate irrigation applications or shortages in water supply (Martin et al, 1984;Scheierling et al, 1997;Kirda et al, 1999;Raes et al, 2006;Shrestha et al, 2010). Relationships between crop yield and evapotranspiration may subsequently be used to develop crop water production functions that relate crop yield to the field water supply, which includes effective precipitation, stored soil moisture depletion, and irrigation amounts that account for spray droplet evaporation and water drift outside the target area, surface runoff, and deep percolation losses (Stewart and Hagan, 1973;Vaux and Pruitt, 1983;Howell, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stewart et al (1977) and Doorenbos and Kassam (1979) predicted relative yield reductions from the product of relative evapotranspiration deficits and a crop-specific yield response factor or yield reduction ratio. This approach has been used extensively to estimate relative yield from inadequate irrigation applications or shortages in water supply (Martin et al, 1984;Scheierling et al, 1997;Kirda et al, 1999;Raes et al, 2006;Shrestha et al, 2010). Relationships between crop yield and evapotranspiration may subsequently be used to develop crop water production functions that relate crop yield to the field water supply, which includes effective precipitation, stored soil moisture depletion, and irrigation amounts that account for spray droplet evaporation and water drift outside the target area, surface runoff, and deep percolation losses (Stewart and Hagan, 1973;Vaux and Pruitt, 1983;Howell, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high sensitivity of maize to water stress means that under water limiting conditions it is difficult to implement irrigation management strategies without incurring significant yield losses [4,15]. Much of the past research on water stress on maize has consisted of full withholding of irrigation and conditions of severe water stress [11,12]. It is clear from the literature that cessation of irrigation in maize causes significant yield losses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grain yield can be reduced by decreasing yield components like grain number and grain weight [5,9]. Many researchers have evaluated the effect of timing of water stress on maize yield [6,[10][11][12]. Flowering has been found to be the most sensitive stage to water deficit, with reductions in biomass, yield and harvest index [4,5,9,13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roots were assumed to be evenly distributed to a depth of 0.5 m (FAO 2010). The parameters of the van Genuchten (1987) root water uptake stress response model were assumed to be as follows: h 50 = -5,000 cm and P = 3 (Scheierling et al 1997). Initial matric head in the flow domain was set to be uniform and equal to the matric head measured in the experimental field for both of the simulated growth periods (-30 and -25 cm, respectively).…”
Section: Experiments With Different Transpiration Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%