2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10672-022-09429-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Leader-Member Exchange on Innovative Work Behavior of Information Technology Project Employees; Role of Employee Engagement and Self-Efficacy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies on leader-member exchange indicate that the theory has important relationships with many work outcomes. Leader-member exchange is negatively correlated with intention to quit (Kim et al, 2016), organizational silence (Chan & Yeung, 2016), cyberloafing behavior (Baş et al, 2022), burnout (Huang et al, 2010), organizational cynicism (Mumcu, 2021) and compulsory organizational citizenship behavior (Koçak, 2018), whereas it is positively associated with innovative work behavior (Ghulam et al, 2022), organizational identification (Zeynel, 2021), work performance (Loi et al, 2011), organizational commitment (Windeler & Riemenschneider, 2016), job satisfaction (Epitropaki & Martin, 2005) and job dedication (Michael et al, 2005).…”
Section: Leader-member Exchangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on leader-member exchange indicate that the theory has important relationships with many work outcomes. Leader-member exchange is negatively correlated with intention to quit (Kim et al, 2016), organizational silence (Chan & Yeung, 2016), cyberloafing behavior (Baş et al, 2022), burnout (Huang et al, 2010), organizational cynicism (Mumcu, 2021) and compulsory organizational citizenship behavior (Koçak, 2018), whereas it is positively associated with innovative work behavior (Ghulam et al, 2022), organizational identification (Zeynel, 2021), work performance (Loi et al, 2011), organizational commitment (Windeler & Riemenschneider, 2016), job satisfaction (Epitropaki & Martin, 2005) and job dedication (Michael et al, 2005).…”
Section: Leader-member Exchangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Employee engagement, as an affective motivational state, focuses on individuals' cognitive beliefs regarding organizational goals, while commitment pertains to their perception of being valued, energized, or disconnected at work (Carter, 2018). Individuals who possess a strong sense of self-efficacy are inclined to exhibit a greater propensity for demonstrating innovative work behaviour (Mustafa et al, 2022). The Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) is a comprehensive measurement tool that captures both affective and cognitive elements of employee engagement, emphasizing aspects such as vigor, dedication, and absorption (Gayathiri, 2013).…”
Section: Self-efficacy (Se) and Employee Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%