2013
DOI: 10.2478/v10298-012-0079-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Livestock Manure, Nitrogen and Biofertilizer (Azotobacter) on Yield and Yield Components Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.)

Abstract: Integrated nutrient management strategies involving chemical and biologic fertilizer is a real challenge to stop using the high rates of agrochemicals and to enhance sustainability of crop production. In order to study the effects of livestock manure, chemical nitrogen, and biologic (Azotobacter) fertilizers on yield and yield components of wheat, an agricultural experiment in the form of split factorial design with three replications was conducted in Elam region, Iran. The aim of this research was assessment … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is maybe due to the increase in the number of spikes per square meter and the number of grain per spike (Tables 6 and 7). These results were similar to the Al-Juboory et al Esmailpour et al (2013) who confirmed the response of wheat to spraying with biofertilizer. Ibaa99 cultivar which had three times of EM-1 spraying gave the highest grain yield (4.11 and 4.58 ton*ha -1 ).…”
Section: Weight Of 1000 Grain (G)supporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is maybe due to the increase in the number of spikes per square meter and the number of grain per spike (Tables 6 and 7). These results were similar to the Al-Juboory et al Esmailpour et al (2013) who confirmed the response of wheat to spraying with biofertilizer. Ibaa99 cultivar which had three times of EM-1 spraying gave the highest grain yield (4.11 and 4.58 ton*ha -1 ).…”
Section: Weight Of 1000 Grain (G)supporting
confidence: 91%
“…The best yield was obtained using EM-1 in the concentration of 1:500. Esmailpour et al (2013) noticed that using biofertilizer Azotobacter had led to an increase in grain yield of wheat (3,360 kg*ha -1 ) in comparison to the control (2,839 kg*ha -1 ). Ghaderi-Daneshmand et al (2012) found that using biofertilizer (biophospor and nitroxin) had led to significant differences in grain numbers per spike, and grain weight compared to the control, which eventually increased the final yield, in addition to the decreasing of the environmental pollution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On contrary, this result was confirmation of report by Singh et al (2005). These results were also confirmed by Esmailpour et al (2013), Mirshekari and Kauchebagh (2013). The current experiment finding was also in favour of results of synergistic effect of biofertilizers with chemical fertilizers on increasing the test weight of grains.…”
Section: Yield Components and Yieldsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Soil microorganisms are important components in the natural soil subecosystem because not only can they contribute to nutrient availability in the soil, but also bind soil particles into stable aggregates, which improve soil structure and reduce erosion potential (Shetty et al, 1994). Many authors have shown the positive effect of bio-fertilizers (Azotobacter and Azospirillum) on wheat (Ahmed et al, 2011;Abd El-Lattief, 2012;Esmailpour et al, 2013;Mohamed et al, 2013;Taher et al, 2013).…”
Section: Plant Production Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sugar cane filter mud is a good source of available N when applied to soil and its application cane reduce the amount of fertilizer nitrogen required for optimum crop yield and play a role in decreasing the pollution effect of excessive N mineral fertilizer in soil (Arafat et al, 1997 andYassen et al, 2002), The use of organic fertilization had a positive effect on wheat where led to increased plant height, biological and grain yields (Abd El-Lattief, 2008;Abejehu, 2009;Ozturk et al, 2012;Esmailpour et al, 2013;Youssef et al, 2013;Zahoor, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%