2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on functional network connectivity in schizophrenia patients with auditory verbal hallucinations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, rTMS has the potential to reshape the connectivity of functionally interconnected regions by entraining endogenous brain oscillations (Thut & Miniussi, 2009 ) and thereby improving neural synchrony. Our prior investigation demonstrated that functional network connectivity is enhanced in schizophrenia patients with AVH following treatment, as determined by low‐frequency rTMS (Xie, Guan, Cai, et al, 2023 ; Xie, Guan, Wang, et al, 2023 ). Moreover, it has been observed that low‐frequency rTMS modulates the somatomotor network, which is accountable for somatic movements and sensations (Oosterwijk et al, 2012 ), thereby coordinating its structural and functional attributes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, rTMS has the potential to reshape the connectivity of functionally interconnected regions by entraining endogenous brain oscillations (Thut & Miniussi, 2009 ) and thereby improving neural synchrony. Our prior investigation demonstrated that functional network connectivity is enhanced in schizophrenia patients with AVH following treatment, as determined by low‐frequency rTMS (Xie, Guan, Cai, et al, 2023 ; Xie, Guan, Wang, et al, 2023 ). Moreover, it has been observed that low‐frequency rTMS modulates the somatomotor network, which is accountable for somatic movements and sensations (Oosterwijk et al, 2012 ), thereby coordinating its structural and functional attributes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have targeted the temporoparietal junction, generally using an "inhibitory" protocol [293][294][295] , as it represents a core region of overactivity within neural circuits associated with hallucinations 304 . Studies examining post-treatment changes found increased network connectivity in regions of the auditory/sensorimotor, central executive, and default mode networks 305 , and normalized connectivity between the default mode and language networks, and within the auditory and central executive networks 306 . Another protocol using "excitatory" rTMS, with a functionally identified target in the language region of the superior temporal sulcus, observed a decrease in hallucinations 307 .…”
Section: Neurostimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, dynamic FC (dFC) analysis has emerged as an increasingly popular topic, which can capture inherent dynamic communication of brain functional networks [3], and has been widely used in various brain diseases, including such as Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia, and depressive disorder [4]. Schizophrenia is a complex psychiatric disorder that affects cognitive and emotional processes, and aberrant connectivity symptoms among auditory (AUD), executive control and cerebellum have been founded in schizophrenia [5][6][7], and is associated with clinical symptoms, such as AUD hallucinations [8,9]. Several dFC-related investigations also have revealed some significant FC in schizophrenia patients [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%